Showing posts with label Uranium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Uranium. Show all posts

Sunday, June 17, 2012

Dimock Pennsylvania Well Water Quality


Comment

1. Without predrilling data, it is not possible to comment on the cause for any water quality problems.
2. Where possible, I have noted situations where elevated levels of a water quality parameter exists in Pennsylvania.
3. If duplicate analysis provided, I attempted to use the highest reported value.
5. This is not about cause and effect; it is about a review of the data.

Well – HW-18 (1/30/2012)

With the exception of the following parameters, the remaining values were reported as NOT Detected (U)

Heterotrophic Bacteria – 73 colonies per 100 ml ( I do not understand the J value).  The drinking water limit is < 500 colonies per 100 ml (OK).

Total Coliform < 1 colony per 100 ml (OK)

Aluminum – 0.0346 mg/L (Total) and < 0.030 mg/L (D)- drinking water standard ranges from 0.05 to 0.2 mg/L.   This parameter is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard, because of aesthetic reasons.   The treated water level of aluminum is < 0.030 mg/L.  (OK)

Anionic Surfactants –< 0.01 mg/L – the secondary drinking water standard for foaming agents is 0.5 mg/L.  (OK)

Arsenic – 0.0022 mg/L – drinking water standard is <  0.010 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact and arsenic is a common problem in NEPA – about 6 % of private wells have arsenic above 0.010 mg/L.  The treated water level of arsenic was 0.0021 mg/L and treated and filtered 0.0026 mg/L.  (Ok – monitoring recommended)

Barium – 0.276 mg/L – the primary drinking water standard for barium is 2.0 mg/L –– this does not suggest any specific impact and barium is typically detectable in non-saline impacted water at a level of less than 1 mg/L. After treatment, the concentration is 0.309 mg/L.  (OK)

Bromide – < 0.5 mg/L - In freshwater, bromide is typically less than 0.05 mg/L. Therefore, it would be advisable to retest using a method with a lower detection limit.
 Other References

Boron –0.186 mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available. EPA appears to have a long-term health advisory of 2.0 mg/L, but other states have limits that range from 0.6 to 1 mg/L.   Therefore, this does not appear to suggest any form of impact.  (OK- but monitoring advisable)

Calcium- 16.0 mg/L (Total)– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  After treatment, the level of Calcium is 18.3 mg/L.(OK)

Chloride –2.84 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.   After treatment, the reported value was 5.05 mg/L (OK).

Chromium-< 0.002 mg/L (D) and the EPA/ PADEP primary drinking water standard is
< 0.100 mg/L (OK).

Copper – < 0.002 mg/L  (Untreated) - the secondary drinking water standard is 1.0 mg/L and the primary drinking water standard is 1.3 mg/L. (OK)  At the tap the level was 0.0078 mg/L – this suggests there is some level of corrosion and leaching of copper in the plumbing for the home.

Ethane –< 0.0012 mg/L  – No specific drinking water standard (OK)

Fluoride – 0.117 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is < 2 mg/L- PADEP drinking water standard is 2 mg/L.   After treatment, the reported value was 0.26 mg/L (OK).

Iron – < 0.100 mg/L (Total)) – Iron is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.3 mg/L.  Therefore, the total iron content does not exceed the secondary drinking water standard.  (OK)

Lead – < 0.001 mg/L (Total) - Lead is regulated as a primary standard (EPA and PA) at 0.015 mg/L, but the action level in PA for source water is 0.005 mg/L. (OK)

Lithium – < 0.200 mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but EPA has recommend a level be below 0.7 mg/L    (OK)

Methane   0.190 mg/L   – No specific drinking water standard. The well water is below the new action limit of 7 mg/L.   After treatment, the level of methane is 0.160 mg/L. For more details, go to http://www.water-research.net/methanegas.htm

Magnesium-2.73 mg/L– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK)  The treated water level of magnesium was 3.07 mg/L.

Manganese– 0.0062 mg/L (Total) – Manganese is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.05 mg/L.  Therefore, the total manganese content does not exceed the secondary drinking water standard.   After treatment the level is 0.0078 mg/L. (OK)

Nickel – < 0.001 mg/L  – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard
is available, but the EPA has suggest a MCL of 0.1 mg/L.   (OK) 

Potassium – <  2.0 mg/L (Total–  no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available (Ok)

Sodium –45.6  mg/L  – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but the EPA has added it to the Candidate List to provide more analysis.  The EPA’s initial value of 20 mg/L has been clearly identified as not realistic.  When chloride (salt is sodium chloride) is present at a concentration of over 250 mg/L, the water can have an “off” taste. At 400+ mg/L chloride, the water will taste definitely salty. (Source- Dr. Brian Redmond, Professional Geologist).  After treatment, the level was 37.0 mg/L. (OK)

Sulfate –7.53 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Strontium  0.954 mg/L   – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but it is on the EPA Candidate List.  The EPA recommends that drinking water levels of nonradioactive strontium should not be more than 4 mg/L.  The report limit is consistent with background levels in Northeastern Pennsylvania.  If the background level was above 4 mg/L, it would be advisable to test for radiological parameters, especially alpha/beta.  (OK)  After treatment, the level is 1.09 mg/L.

Total Dissolved Solids   138 mg/L   – Total Dissolved Solids is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 500 mg/L.  After treatment the level was 73 mg/L- this value seems to be low (OK).

Total Suspended Solids - < 10 mg/L – no standard, but would recommend retesting to obtain a lower detection limit.

Uranium 0.001 mg/L (Total) – Uranium is regulated as a primary drinking water standard by the EPA and PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.030 mg/L.  (OK)

Zinc  –< 0.002 mg/L – Zinc is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 5.0 mg/L.  (OK)

Nitrate+Nitrite- N – < 0.05 mg/L, this is well below the EPA / PADEP drinking water limit of 10mg N/L for nitrate-N and would also be below the limit of 1.0 mg N/L for nitrite-N. (OK)

Acetone - the reported value was < 0.002 mg/L.  PADEP has a Medium Specific Concentration (MSC) for aquifers with a TDS of < 2500 mg/L of 33.0 mg/L and Massachusetts appears to have a drinking water standard of 6.3 mg/L. (OK)  The value in the treated water was  < 0.0033 mg/L (Not your why the detection limit changed).

Bromoform – < 0.0005 mg/L – the Total Trihalomethane Group has a limit of 0.08 mg/L, but bromoform should be less than 0.004 mg/L.  (OK)

Methyl ethyl ketone – < 0.002 mg/L in the treated water and untreated water. (OK)
Methyl ethyl ketone is a colorless volatile liquid that is soluble in water. The odor threshold for methyl ethyl ketone is 5.4 parts per million (ppm), with an acetone-like odor reported. Methyl ethyl ketone is also referred to as 2-butanone.   The EPA and PADEP has not set a drinking water standard, but it appears that Massachusetts has set a level of 4 mg/L.
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/hlthef/methylet.html

Ethylene glycol –  the reported value is < 10 mg/L – there is not standard, but the EPA has a guidance limit of < 7 mg/L.  Other states have lower and higher standards:

New Jersey 0.300 mg/L (300 ppb)
Arizona 5.5 mg/L (5500 ppb)
New Hampshire 7.0 mg/L (7000 ppb)
FloridaMassachusetts, and Minnesota14.0 mg/L (14,000 ppb)
Minnesota

At a minimum, I would recommend:

a.  retesting for ethylene glycol other and glycol-type compounds using a method that is more sensitive or conducting some type of standard additions analysis;
b. retesting total dissolved solids; and
c. monitoring arsenic, retesting bromide to a lower level, and monitoring strontium


Annual Water Testing 

Watercheck with Pesticide Option (Order Online)- This informational testing package will check for 103 contaminants in your well water.  These contaminants include Bacteria, (19) Heavy Metals & Minerals, (6) Other Inorganic Chemicals, (5) Physical Characteristics, (4) Trihalomethanes (disinfection by-products), (47) Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs), and (20) Pesticides, Herbicides and PCBs.  This package works well for well water customers (Code 9002)- $ 206.00, plus shipping - Request information .

Add Methane (Order from us) - We can do a methane, ethane, propane - test for about $ 100.00 
( self collection)-Request information .
This document can not be copied in whole or part without the expressed written permission of Mr. Brian Oram, B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc. http://www.bfenvironmental.com

Do you want to make a positive change in PA - that will cost you NO Money?
Help Support the Citizens Groundwater and Surfacewater Database and Submit Your Baseline Data !

 Free Information on Drinking Water Quality - http://www.water-research.net

arsenic, bromide, strontium, glycols, uranium, barium, aluminium, standard  plate count, Dimock PA Well Water

Saturday, May 19, 2012

Dimock Pennsylvania Water Contamination EPA Testing Water On Fire

A fact based review - Well by Well of the Available Well Water Data for the Dimock Area that was generated by the EPA.    I was not involved with the sampling, but I was on-site during the sampling and field evaluation of one home.  I was invited by the homeowner.   We are still in the process of reviewing the data.  The main goal of this evaluation is to understand the nature of the regional water quality and to provide a fact based review of the data.   The results are compared the EPA and Pennsylvania Drinking Water Standards.  If no standard was available, we searched for a standard that has been established by another state or the World Health Organization.

HW-1 Dimock Private Well Marcellus Shale EPA Sampling January 2012
http://pennsylvania-solutions.blogspot.com/2012/04/hw-1-dimock-private-well-marcellus.html

Dimock Well – HW-02 January 25, 2012 - a review of the data


HW-3 EPA Dimock methyl ethyl ketone MEK 2-Butanone carbon disulfide Caprolactam methane iron


EPA Dimock Well Water Pennsylvania Water Quality Dimock HW-4 Janurary 2012 EPA Data Private Well Review by Oram- Barium, Iron, Lead, Benzo(a)pyrene, 4-Bromopheyl-Phenyl Ether, Fluoranthene,


HW- 5 EPA Dimock Iron methane barium well water PA


HW-6 Dimock Data EPA barium, copper, methane, nickel, thermogenic


Well Water Dimock Pennsylvania HW-7 February 2012 EPA barium, manganese, lead, copper, nickel, zinc


Dimock EPA Private Well Data HW-8 glycols, bacteria, copper, lead, methane, acetone, Anthracene


Dimock Well Water HW-9 Acetone, Arsenic, Barium, Copper, Lead, Lithium, ethane, methane, glycols Pennsylvania


HW-11 Dimock Water Quality Methane, Acetone, Methyl ethyl ketone, Manganese, glycols, barium, strontium, uranium, thermogenic


Well – HW-12 Dimock 1/26/2012 A Review-  Arsenic, Boron, Barium, Iron, Manganse, Nickel, Strontium, Uranium, Methane, Chloroethane, Methyl Chloride


HW-13 Dimock Data EPA January 30, 2012


HW-14 EPA Dimock Data Review January 2012 Biogenic Gas


Dimock HW-17 arsenic, barium, methane, uranium, thermogenic gasEPA Findings


HW-19 Dimock Data Review - EPA Findings - barium, chloride, phthalates


Dimock HW-24 boron fluoride methane lithium barium glycols

Annual Water Testing 

Watercheck with Pesticide Option (Order Online)- This informational testing package will check for 103 contaminants in your well water.  These contaminants include Bacteria, (19) Heavy Metals & Minerals, (6) Other Inorganic Chemicals, (5) Physical Characteristics, (4) Trihalomethanes (disinfection by-products), (47) Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs), and (20) Pesticides, Herbicides and PCBs.  This package works well for well water customers (Code 9002)- $ 206.00, plus shipping - Request information .

Add Methane (Order from us) - We can do a methane, ethane, propane - test for about $ 100.00 
( self collection)-Request information .


For free Information on Water Quality - Go to http://www.water-research.net

Document can not be copied in whole or part without the expressed written permission of Mr. Brian Oram, B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc. http://www.bfenvironmental.com

Do you want to make a positive change in PA - that will cost you NO Money- Yes it is FREE

Help Support the Citizens Groundwater and Surfacewater Database and Submit Your Baseline Data FOR FREE !


Thursday, May 17, 2012

HW-11 Dimock Water Quality Methane, Acetone, Methyl ethyl ketone, Manganese, glycols, barium, strontium, uranium, thermogenic



Comment

1. Without predrilling data, it is not possible to comment on the cause for any water quality problems.
2. Where possible, I have noted situations where elevated levels of a water quality parameter exists in Pennsylvania.
3. If duplicate analysis provided, I attempted to use the highest reported value.
5. This is not about cause and effect; it is about a review of the data.
6. Note- Suspected detects for acetone and ketone were after the treatment system and not before treatment.
7. Treatment system appears to reduce the methane to well below any action limit.

Well – HW-11 (2/13/2012)

With the exception of the following parameters, the remaining values were reported as NOT Detected (U)

Anionic Surfactants – < 0.01 mg/L – the secondary drinking water standard for foaming agents is 0.5 mg/L.  (OK)

Arsenic – < 0.001 mg/L – drinking water standard is <  0.010 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact and arsenic is a common problem in NEPA – about 6 % of private wells have arsenic above 0.010 mg/L. 

Barium – 0.164 mg/L – the primary drinking water standard for barium is 2.0 mg/L –– this does not suggest any specific impact and barium is typically detectable in non-saline impacted water at a level of less than 1 mg/L. (OK)

Boron –< 0.050 mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available. EPA appears to have a long-term health advisory of 2.0 mg/L, but other states have limits that range from 0.6 to 1 mg/L.   Therefore, this does not appear to suggest any form of impact.  (OK)

Calcium- 35.5 mg/L (Total)– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK) – the value seems low.

Chloride –7.24 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Chromium- < 0.002 mg/L (D) and the EPA/ PADEP primary drinking water standard is < 0.100 mg/L (OK).

Copper – < 0.002 mg/L  (Untreated) - the secondary drinking water standard is 1.0 mg/L and the primary drinking water standard is 1.3 mg/L. (OK)

Ethane –0.320 mg/L  – No specific drinking water standard (OK)

Fluoride – < 0.1 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is < 2 mg/L- PADEP drinking water standard is 2 mg/L.

Iron – < 0.100 mg/L (Total)) – Iron is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.3 mg/L.  Therefore, the total iron content does not exceed the secondary drinking water standard.  (OK)

Lead – < 0.001 mg/L (Total) - Lead is regulated as a primary standard (EPA and PA) at 0.015 mg/L, but the action level in PA for source water is 0.005 mg/L. (OK)

Lithium – < 0.200 mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but EPA has recommend a level be below 0.7 mg/L    (OK)

Methane   22 mg/L   – No specific drinking water standard. (Action is needed). The well water is above the new action limit of 7 mg/L- The well should be actively vented, but it may be advisable to evaluate a structural modification to the well and changing the pumping system. For more details, go to http://www.water-research.net/methanegas.htm

Magnesium-8.13 mg/L– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK)

Manganese– 0.0457 mg/L (Total) – Manganese is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.05 mg/L.  Therefore, the total manganese content does Not exceed the secondary drinking water standard, but it is approaching the value.  Some intermittent problems with discolored water may occur – additional monitoring recommended.   (OK)

Nickel – 0.0014 mg/L  – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard
is available, but the EPA has suggest a MCL of 0.1 mg/L.   (OK)

Sodium –8.48  mg/L  – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but the EPA has added it to the Candidate List to provide more analysis.  The EPA’s initial value of 20 mg/L has been clearly identified as not realistic.  When chloride (salt is sodium chloride) is present at a concentration of over 250 mg/L, the water can have an “off” taste. At 400+ mg/L chloride, the water will taste definitely salty. (Source- Dr. Brian Redmond, Professional Geologist). (OK)

Sulfate –13. 7 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Strontium 0.469 mg/L   – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but it is on the EPA Candidate List.  The EPA recommends that drinking water levels of nonradioactive strontium should not be more than 4 mg/L.  The report limit is consistent with background levels in Northeastern Pennsylvania.  If the background level was above 4 mg/L, it would be advisable to test for radiological parameters, especially alpha/beta.  (OK)

Total Dissolved Solids  110 mg/L   – Total Dissolved Solids is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 500 mg/L. 

Total Suspended Solids - < 10 mg/L – no standard, but would recommend retesting to obtain a lower detection limit.

Uranium 0.0021 mg/L (Total) – Uranium is regulated as a primary drinking water standard by the EPA and PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.030 mg/L.  (OK)

Zinc  0.0042 mg/L – Zinc is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 5.0 mg/L.  (OK)

Nitrate+Nitrite- N – 0.162 mg/L, this is well below the EPA / PADEP drinking water limit of 10mg N/L for nitrate-N and would also be below the limit of 1.0 mg N/L for nitrite-N. (OK)

Acetone - the reported value was 0.0057 mg/L (J/P -actually below the actual water limit of  < 0.002 mg/L- Treated Water- the untreated water had a reported value of  <0.002 mg/L) and no trigger limit is reported, but PADEP has a Medium Specific Concentration (MSC) for aquifers with a TDS of < 2500 mg/L of 33.0 mg/L and Massachusetts appears to have a drinking water standard of 6.3 mg/L. (OK)

Methyl ethyl ketone – 0.0014 mg/L (J/P- the sample is following the treatment system and below the detection limit for the method) – the untreated water had a value of < 0.002 mg/L ) – therefore the result is not actually detectable.
Methyl ethyl ketone is a colorless volatile liquid that is soluble in water. The odor threshold for methyl ethyl ketone is 5.4 parts per million (ppm), with an acetone-like odor reported. Methyl ethyl ketone is also referred to as 2-butanone.   The EPA and PADEP has not set a drinking water standard, but it appears that Massachusetts has set a level of 4 mg/L.  (OK- but additional monitoring advisable)

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/hlthef/methylet.html


Ethylene glycol –  the reported value is < 10 mg/L – there is not standard, but the EPA has a guidance limit of < 7 mg/L.  Other states have lower and higher standards:

New Jersey 0.300 mg/L (300 ppb)
Arizona 5.5 mg/L (5500 ppb)
New Hampshire 7.0 mg/L (7000 ppb)
Florida, Massachusetts, and Minnesota14.0 mg/L (14,000 ppb)
Minnesota

The EPA also collected a treated water sample.  After treatment, the following was documented:

Ethane – From 0.320 mg/L to < 0.0012 mg/L
Methane – From 22.00 mg/L to 0.026 mg/L
Chloride – From 7.24 mg/L to 7.01 mg/L
Sulfate – From 13.74 mg/L to 13.3 mg/L
Barium – From 0.164 mg/L to 0.164 mg/L
Copper – From < 0.002 mg/L to 0.0045 mg/L – suggest corrosion within plumbing of home, the result is still below the action limit.
Sodium – From 9.35 mg/L to 11.8 mg/L
Strontium – From 0.469 mg/L to 0.513 mg/L
Uranium – From  0.0019 mg/L to 0.0019 mg/L
Zinc – 0.0042 mg/L to 0.012 mg/L  - suggest corrosion within plumbing of the home, the result is still below the action limit.
Acetone - < 0.002 mg/L to 0.0057 mg/L (J) – the detect is below the reported detection limit for the method.
Methyl ethyl ketone - < 0.002 mg/L to 0.0014 mg/L – a suspected detect following treatment.

At a minimum, I would recommend retesting for ethylene glycol other and glycol-type compounds using a method that is more sensitive or conducting some type of standard additions analysis.

1. Methane was present at a level that is above the action limit of 7 mg/L and approaching a saturated level.  Action is needed.  Since the ratio of methane/ethane is 68 – this would suggest that the gas is of Thermogenic origin/

2. Methyl ethyl ketone and Acetone hits were suggested, but the reported values were actually below the method detection limit.  This suggests that additional monitoring may be advisable.

3. Detects for ketone and acetone after treatment suggest that this may be related to recent repairs or changes in the plumbing for the home.

4.Manganese is just below the secondary drinking water standard – continued monitoring is advisable.

Document can not be copied in whole or part without the expressed written permission of Mr. Brian Oram, B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc. http://www.bfenvironmental.com

Do you want to make a positive change in PA - that will cost you NO Money?
Help Support the Citizens Groundwater and Surfacewater Database and Submit Your Baseline Data !

 Free Information on Drinking Water Quality - http://www.water-research.net

Saturday, May 5, 2012

HW-6 Dimock Data EPA barium, copper, methane, nickel, thermogenic


Comment

1. Without predrilling data, it is not possible to comment on the cause for any water quality problems.
2. Where possible, I have noted situations where elevated levels of a water quality parameter exists in Pennsylvania.
3. If duplicate analysis provided, I attempted to use the highest reported value.
5. This is not about cause and effect; it is about a review of the data.
Well – HW-6

With the exception of the following parameters, the remaining values were reported as NOT Detected (U)

Barium – 0.254 mg/L – the primary drinking water standard for barium is 2.0 mg/L –– this does not suggest any specific impact and barium is typically detectable in non-saline impacted water at a level of less than 1 mg/L. (OK)

Calcium- 35.3 mg/L (Total)– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK)

Chloride – 7.47 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Copper – 0.0025 mg/L (OK)- the secondary drinking water standard is 1.0 mg/L and the primary drinking water standard is 1.3 mg/L. (OK)

Ethane 0.011 mg/L  – No specific drinking water standard (OK)

Methane 2.0 mg/L  – No specific drinking water standard. (OK).
The well water is not above the new action limit of 7 mg/L, but the well should be fitted with a basic vented well cap, but the level of methane is at a level were passive venting is recommended.   For more details, go to http://www.water-research.net/methanegas.htm

The methane/ethane ratio is (2.0/ 0.011) – 181  (Suggests biogenic, but isotopic analysis is needed)

Iron – 0.620 mg/L - Iron is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.3 mg/L.  Therefore, the total iron content exceeds the secondary drinking water standard.  Elevated level of iron is a common water quality problem in Northeastern PennsylvaniaAction is Recommended, because of an aesthetic issue.    Check for MIC and Nuisance Bacteria.

Magnesium- 6.82 mg/L (Total)– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK)

Manganese– 0.0316 mg/L (Total)– Manganese is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.05 mg/L.  Therefore, the total manganese content does not exceed the secondary drinking water standard.   (OK)

Nickel - 0.0012 mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but the EPA has suggest a MCL of 0.1 mg/L.   (OK)

Nitrate+Nitrite- N – 0.699 mg/L, this is well below the EPA / PADEP drinking water limit of 10mg N/L for nitrate-N and would also be below the limit of 1.0 mg N/L for nitrite-N. (OK)

Sodium –13.2 (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but the EPA has added it to the Candidate List to provide more analysis.  The EPA’s initial value of 20 mg/L has been clearly identified as not realistic.  When chloride (salt is sodium chloride) is present at a concentration of over 250 mg/L, the water can have an “off” taste. At 400+ mg/L chloride, the water will taste definitely salty. (Source- Dr. Brian Redmond, Professional Geologist). (OK)

Strontium 0.720 mg/L (Total)  – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but it is on the EPA Candidate List.  The EPA recommends that drinking water levels of nonradioactive strontium should not be more than 4 mg/L.  The report limit is consistent with background levels in Northeastern Pennsylvania.  If the background level was above 4 mg/L, it would be advisable to test for radiological parameters, especially alpha/beta.  (OK)

Sulfate – 10.6 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Total Dissolved Solids  25 mg/L   – Total Dissolved Solids is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 500 mg/L.  (Question – this value seems inaccurate or a typo – This should be redone.)

Uranium 0.0045 mg/L (Total) – Uranium is regulated as a primary drinking water standard by the EPA and PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.030 mg/L.  (OK)

Zinc  0.0055 mg/L (Total) – Zinc is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 5.0 mg/L.  (OK)
  
Ethylene glycol –  the reported value is < 10 mg/L – there is no standard, but the EPA has a guidance limit of < 7 mg/L.  Other states have lower and higher standards:

New Jersey 0.300 mg/L (300 ppb)
Arizona 5.5 mg/L (5500 ppb)
New Hampshire 7.0 mg/L (7000 ppb)
Florida, Massachusetts, and Minnesota14.0 mg/L (14,000 ppb)
Minnesota

At a minimum, I would recommend retesting for ethylene glycol other other glycol compounds using a method that is more sensitive or conducting some type of standard additions analysis.

No major problems

1. No major problem.

2. Iron is elevated and exceeds a secondary drinking water standard.

3. Methane/Ethane Ratio would suggest that isotopic analysis is advisable.
origin and the level of methane is well below the action level of 7 mg/L, but at the action level of 2 mg/L were passive venting is recommended.
4.Total Dissolved Solids results seem inaccurate or there is a typo in the draft report.

5. Retesting for glycols using a more sensitive technique is recommended.


Document can not be copied in whole or part without the expressed written permission of Mr. Brian Oram, B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc. http://www.bfenvironmental.com

Do you want to make a positive change in PA - that will cost you NO Money?
Help Support the Citizens Groundwater and Surfacewater Database and Submit Your Baseline Data !

 Free Information on Drinking Water Quality - http://www.water-research.net



Dimock HW-17 arsenic, barium, methane, uranium, thermogenic gasEPA Findings


Comment

1. Without predrilling data, it is not possible to comment on the cause for any water quality problems.
2. Where possible, I have noted situations where elevated levels of a water quality parameter exists in Pennsylvania.
3. If duplicate analysis provided, I attempted to use the highest reported value.
5. This is not about cause and effect; it is about a review of the data.
Well – HW-17

With the exception of the following parameters, the remaining values were reported as NOT Detected (U)

Barium – 0.239 mg/L – the primary drinking water standard for barium is 2.0 mg/L –– this does not suggest any specific impact and barium is typically detectable in non-saline impacted water at a level of less than 1 mg/L. (OK)

Calcium- 33.1 mg/L (Total)– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK)

Chloride – 7.12 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Copper – 0.0035 mg/L (OK)- the secondary drinking water standard is 1.0 mg/L and the primary drinking water standard is 1.3 mg/L. (OK)

Ethane 0.040 mg/L  – No specific drinking water standard (OK)

Methane 3.3 mg/L  – No specific drinking water standard. (OK).
The well water is not above the new action limit of 7 mg/L, but the well should be fitted with a basic vented well cap, but the level of methane is at a level were passive venting is recommended.   For more details, go to http://www.water-research.net/methanegas.htm

The methane/ethane ratio is (2.0/ 0.011) – 82.5

Magnesium- 6.64 mg/L (Total)– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK)

Manganese– 0.040 mg/L (Total)– Manganese is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.05 mg/L.  Therefore, the total manganese content does not exceed the secondary drinking water standard.   (OK)

Nickel - 0.0012 mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but the EPA has suggest a MCL of 0.1 mg/L.   (OK)

Nitrate+Nitrite- N – 0.707 mg/L, this is well below the EPA / PADEP drinking water limit of 10mg N/L for nitrate-N and would also be below the limit of 1.0 mg N/L for nitrite-N. (OK)

Sodium –12.1 (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but the EPA has added it to the Candidate List to provide more analysis.  The EPA’s initial value of 20 mg/L has been clearly identified as not realistic.  When chloride (salt is sodium chloride) is present at a concentration of over 250 mg/L, the water can have an “off” taste. At 400+ mg/L chloride, the water will taste definitely salty. (Source- Dr. Brian Redmond, Professional Geologist). (OK)

Strontium 0.835 mg/L (Total)  – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but it is on the EPA Candidate List.  The EPA recommends that drinking water levels of nonradioactive strontium should not be more than 4 mg/L.  The report limit is consistent with background levels in Northeastern Pennsylvania.  If the background level was above 4 mg/L, it would be advisable to test for radiological parameters, especially alpha/beta.  (OK)

Sulfate – 10.4 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Total Dissolved Solids  52 mg/L   – Total Dissolved Solids is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 500 mg/L. 

Uranium 0.0037 mg/L (Total) – Uranium is regulated as a primary drinking water standard by the EPA and PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.030 mg/L.  (OK)

Zinc  0.0065 mg/L (Total) – Zinc is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 5.0 mg/L.  (OK)

Arsenic – 0.0027 mg/L (Total) – drinking water standard is <  0.010 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact and arsenic is a common problem in NEPA – about 6 % of private wells have arsenic above 0.010 mg/L.  It would be advisable to monitor the arsenic level of the well on an annual basis.
  
Ethylene glycol –  the reported value is < 10 mg/L – there is no standard, but the EPA has a guidance limit of < 7 mg/L.  Other states have lower and higher standards:

New Jersey 0.300 mg/L (300 ppb)
Arizona 5.5 mg/L (5500 ppb)
New Hampshire 7.0 mg/L (7000 ppb)
Florida, Massachusetts, and Minnesota14.0 mg/L (14,000 ppb)
Minnesota

At a minimum, I would recommend retesting for ethylene glycol other other glycol compounds using a method that is more sensitive or conducting some type of standard additions analysis.

1. No major problem.

2. Arsenic was detected, but not above a drinking water standard, but annual monitoring recommended.

3. Methane/Ethane Ratio could suggest the source of the methane is of thermogenic
origin and the level of methane is well below the action level of 7 mg/L, but at the action level of 2 mg/L were passive venting is recommended.
4. Retesting for glycols using a more sensitive technique is recommended.


Document can not be copied in whole or part without the expressed written permission of Mr. Brian Oram, B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc. http://www.bfenvironmental.com

Do you want to make a positive change in PA - that will cost you NO Money?
Help Support the Citizens Groundwater and Surfacewater Database and Submit Your Baseline Data !

 Free Information on Drinking Water Quality - http://www.water-research.net

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

HW-13 Dimock Data EPA January 30, 2012

Comment

1. Without predrilling data, it is not possible to comment on the cause for any water quality problems.
2. Where possible, I have noted situations where elevated levels of a water quality parameter exists in Pennsylvania.
3. If duplicate analysis provided, I attempted to use the highest reported value.
5. This is not about cause and effect; it is about a review of the data.

Well – HW-13

With the exception of the following parameters, the remaining values were reported as NOT Detected (U)

Anionic Surfactants – < 0.01 mg/L – the secondary drinking water standard for foaming agents is 0.5 mg/L.  (OK)

Heterotrophic Bacteria – 560 cfu/ml -the general guidance for “standard plate count” or total bacterial count is < 500 colonies per ml (OK).  This would suggest a potential bacterial issue and if there are problems with iron, manganese, discolored water, or odor, it is possible that the cause could be related to microbiologically induced corrosion and “nuisance bacteria”.

Ethane 0.024 mg/L  – No specific drinking water standard (OK)

Methane 1.30 mg/L  – No specific drinking water standard. (OK).
The well water is not above the new action limit of 7 mg/L, but the well should be fitted with a basic vented well cap.   For more details, go to http://www.water-research.net/methanegas.htm

There are places in PA were baseline levels of methane gas are at or above 7 mg/L. In general, I would estimate that 1 to 3 % of private wells may have elevated levels of methane.  In addition to modifying the well, it would be advisable to conduct isotopic analysis.  Based on the ratio of methane to ethane, the ratio is 54.  This suggests the gas is of thermogenic origin and isotopic analysis is critical.  No specific health concern – but action needed to properly vent gas. 

Ethylene glycol –  the reported value is < 10 mg/L – there is no standard, but the EPA has a guidance limit of < 7 mg/L.  Other states have lower and higher standards:

New Jersey 0.300 mg/L (300 ppb)
Arizona 5.5 mg/L (5500 ppb)
New Hampshire 7.0 mg/L (7000 ppb)
Florida, Massachusetts, and Minnesota14.0 mg/L (14,000 ppb)
Minnesota

At a minimum, I would recommend retesting for ethylene glycol other other glycol compounds using a method that is more sensitive or conducting some type of standard additions analysis.
Note: I have been to this location and conducted only a field screening test for glycol - the field test is manufactured by Chematics Inc. and the result was not detectable for glycol, i.e., < 1 mg/L. 

Chloride – 8.31 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Sulfate – 10.6 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Barium - 0.225 mg/L (Total) and 0.235 mg/L (D) – drinking water standard is <  2 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact and barium is typically detectable in non-saline impacted water at a level of less than 1 mg/L. (OK)

Calcium- 31.9 mg/L (Total) and 33.1 mg/L (D) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK)

Iron – 2.87 mg/L (Total) and 0.33 mg/L (D) – Iron is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.3 mg/L.  Therefore, the total iron content exceeds the secondary drinking water standard.  Elevated level of iron is a common water quality problem in Northeastern PennsylvaniaAction is Recommended, because of an aesthetic issue.    Check for MIC and Nuisance Bacteria.

Magnesium- 6.62 mg/L (Total) and 6.84 mg/L (D) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK)

Manganese– 0.031 mg/L (Total) and 0.0164 mg/L (D) – Manganese is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.05 mg/L.  Therefore, the total manganese content does not exceed the secondary drinking water standard.   (OK)

Nickel - 0.0016 mg/L (Total) and 0.0013 mg/L (D) – – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but the EPA has suggest a MCL of 0.1 mg/L.   (OK)

Sodium –12.6 mg/L (Total) and 12.9 mg/L (D) – – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but the EPA has added it to the Candidate List to provide more analysis.  The EPA’s initial value of 20 mg/L has been clearly identified as not realistic.  When chloride (salt is sodium chloride) is present at a concentration of over 250 mg/L, the water can have an “off” taste. At 400+ mg/L chloride, the water will taste definitely salty. (Source- Dr. Brian Redmond, Professional Geologist). (OK)

Strontium 0.764 mg/L (Total) and 0.774 mg/L (D)  – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but it is on the EPA Candidate List.  The EPA recommends that drinking water levels of nonradioactive strontium should not be more than 4 mg/L.  The report limit is consistent with background levels in Northeastern Pennsylvania.  If the background level was above 4 mg/L, it would be advisable to test for radiological parameters, especially alpha/beta.  (OK)

Toluene – 0.0012 mg/L - Toluene is regulated as a primary drinking water standard by the EPA and PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit and maximum contaminant level goal is 1.0 mg/L, but over 0.0040 mg/L toluene can create odor related problems.  (OK)

Uranium 0.0003 mg/L (Total) and 0.0032 mg/L (D)  – Uranium is regulated as a primary drinking water standard by the EPA and PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.030 mg/L.  (OK)

Zinc  0.004  mg/L (Total) and < 0.002 mg/L (D)  – Zinc is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 5.0 mg/L.  (OK)

Total Dissolved Solids  15 mg/L   – Total Dissolved Solids is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 500 mg/L.  (Question – this value seems inaccurate or a typo – This should be redone.)

Nitrate+Nitrite- N – 0.78  mg/L, this is well below the EPA / PADEP drinking water limit of 10mg N/L for nitrate-N and would also be below the limit of 1.0 mg N/L for nitrite-N. (OK)

Total Nitrogen – 1.45 mg/L (No Standard)

No major problems

1. Heterotrophic bacteria data is elevated.

2. Iron is elevated and exceeds a secondary drinking water standard.

3. Methane/Ethane Ratio could suggest the source of the methane is of thermogenic origin and the level of methane is well below the action level of 7 mg/L.
4.Total Dissolved Solids results seem inaccurate or there is a typo in the draft report.

5. Retesting for glycols using a more sensitive technique is recommended.  Note - I have used a field screening test for glycols and the level was less then 1 mg/L - Note- Not a certified or approved method.

6. Toluene detected – but not at a level above a maximum contaminant level or a level that could cause aesthetic issues. 


Annual Water Testing 

Watercheck with Pesticide Option (Order Online)- This informational testing package will check for 103 contaminants in your well water.  These contaminants include Bacteria, (19) Heavy Metals & Minerals, (6) Other Inorganic Chemicals, (5) Physical Characteristics, (4) Trihalomethanes (disinfection by-products), (47) Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs), and (20) Pesticides, Herbicides and PCBs.  This package works well for well water customers (Code 9002)- $ 206.00, plus shipping - Request information .

Add Methane (Order from us) - We can do a methane, ethane, propane - test for about $ 100.00 
( self collection)-Request information .
Document can not be copied in whole or part without the expressed written permission of Mr. Brian Oram, B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc. http://www.bfenvironmental.com

Do you want to make a positive change in PA - that will cost you NO Money?
Help Support the Citizens Groundwater and Surfacewater Database and Submit Your Baseline Data !

 Free Information on Drinking Water Quality - http://www.water-research.net

Friday, March 23, 2012

Well – HW-12 Dimock 1/26/2012 A Review


Comment

1. Without predrilling data, it is not possible to comment on the cause for any water quality problems.
2. Where possible, I have noted situations where elevated levels of a water quality parameter exists in Pennsylvania.  This is based on my professional experience and other published data.
3. Where appropriate I made recommendations.

Well – HW-12

With the exception of the following parameters, the remaining values were reported as NOT Detected (U)

Chloride – 3.64 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Sulfate – 5.20 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Arsenic – 0.006 mg/L (Total) and 0.0058 mg/L (D) – drinking water standard is <  0.010 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact and arsenic is a common problem in NEPA – about 6 % of private wells have arsenic above 0.010 mg/L.  It would be advisable to monitor the arsenic level of the well on an annual basis.

Barium - 0.707mg/L (Total) and 0.716 mg/L (D) – drinking water standard is <  2 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact and barium is typically detectable in non-saline impacted water at a level of less than 1 mg/L. (OK)

Boron – 0.0538 mg/L (Total) and 0.0522 mg/L (D) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available. EPA appears to have a long-term health advisory of 2.0 mg/L, but other states have limits that range from 0.6 to 1 mg/L.   Minnesota is the state with the lowest standard of 0.600 mg/L.  Therefore, this does not appear to suggest any form of impact.  (OK)

Calcium- 28.5 mg/L (Total) and 28.1 mg/L (D) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK)

Iron – 1.24 mg/L (Total) and < 0.1 mg/L (D) – Iron is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.3 mg/L.  Therefore, the total iron content exceeds the secondary drinking water standard.  Since the total value exceeds the limit and not the dissolved, this suggests that the primary recommendation would be to install a water treatment system to filter the iron colloids or particles from the water.  The water probably has a reddish or brown appearance. Elevated level of iron is a common water quality problem in Northeastern Pennsylvania.  Action is Recommended, because of an aesthetic issue. 

Magnesium- 4.77 mg/L (Total) and 4.67 mg/L (D) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK)

Manganese– 0.12 mg/L (Total) and 0.139 mg/L (D) – Manganese is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.05 mg/L.  Therefore, the total manganese content exceeds the secondary drinking water standard.  Since the manganese is in a dissolved form, the water could become browner in color over time.  Because the water coming out of the well has dissolved manganese, the water treatment system would require either chemical oxidation or some type of ion exchange system. Elevated level of manganese is a common water quality problem in Northeastern Pennsylvania.  Action is Recommended, because of an aesthetic issue. 

Nickel - 0.0012 mg/L (Total) and 0.001 mg/L (D) – – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but the EPA has suggest a MCL of 0.1 mg/L.   (OK)

Sodium – 19.3 mg/L (Total) and 19.3 mg/L (D) – – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but the EPA has added it to the Candidate List to provide more analysis.  The EPA’s initial value of 20 mg/L has been clearly identified as not realistic.  When chloride (salt is sodium chloride) is present at a concentration of over 250 mg/L, the water can have an “off” taste. At 400+ mg/L chloride, the water will taste definitely salty. (Source- Dr. Brian Redmond, Professional Geologist). (OK)

Strontium 0.629 mg/L (Total) and 0.618 mg/L (D)  – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but it is on the EPA Candidate List.  The EPA recommends that drinking water levels of nonradioactive strontium should not be more than 4 mg/L.  The report limit is consistent with background levels in Northeastern Pennsylvania.  If the background level was above 4 mg/L, it would be advisable to test for radiological parameters, especially alpha/beta.  (OK)

Uranium 0.0018 mg/L (Total) and 0.0016 mg/L (D)  – Uranium is regulated as a primary drinking water standard by the EPA and PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.030 mg/L.  (OK)

Zinc  0.0054  mg/L (Total) and < 0.002 mg/L (D)  – Zinc is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 5.0 mg/L.  (OK)

Ethane 2.00  mg/L  – No specific drinking water standard (OK)

Methane 52  mg/L  – No specific drinking water standard, but the level indicates supersaturated conditions.  This means the well pump is pulling in water that is not in equilibrium with the atmosphere.  The well is above the new action limit of 7 mg/L and methane gas mitigation measures should be employed.  These measures not only include venting the well, but also potentially modifying the well, installing treatment, or taking other action.  For more details, go to http://www.water-research.net/methanegas.htm
There are places in PA were baseline levels of methane gas are at or above 7 mg/L. In general, I would estimate that 1 to 3 % of private wells may have elevated levels of methane.  In addition to modifying the well, it would be advisable to conduct isotopic analysis.

Based on the ratio of methane to ethane, the ratio is 26.  Since a ratio of methane to ethane of over 1000 typically suggests a biogenic source and a value of under 100 suggests a thermogenic source, the available information would suggest a thermogenic source for the gas.  As a guide, it may be possible to use a ratio to suggest the source of the gas- “ if the ratio of methane to ethane is 25, the source is thermogenic, but if the ratio is over 2500, then it is biogenic" (Mr. Bob Pirkle, President of Microseeps, Inc.), but between 25 and 2500 this is where isotopic analysis is critical.  


No specific health concern, but a health risk associated with the potential for a flammable environment.  


Action needed to properly vent gas from the well, perhaps modifying the well, water treatment to reduce methane level in the water to < 7 mg/L or more,  and isotopic analysis recommended.

May be advisable to check the level of other gases, such as propane.

Total Dissolved Solids  67  mg/L   – Total Dissolved Solids is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 500 mg/L.  (OK)

Chloroethane – 0.0002 mg/L – there does not appear to be a drinking water standard and the primary route of entry into the body is inhalation.  Chloroethane can be smelled at a level of 0.02 mg/L in water.  “In groundwater, chloroethane changes slowly to ethanol and a chloride salt as a result of reaction with water and chloroethane can be formed through chlorination.”    There does not appear to be an aesthetic issue, but Additional Monitoring Would be Advisable.  No specific health concern, but monitoring recommended.

Methyl Chloride (Chloromethane)– 0.0006 mg/L – there does not appear to be a drinking water standard that is regulated by the EPA or PADEP.  It appears that water companies throughout the country have reported detection of chloromethane in the water. It appears the EPA has provided a recommended lifetime health based exposure risk non-cancer for chloromethane of 0.030 mg/L.  “ Most (99%) of the chloromethane in the environment comes from natural sources.” (OK)


Bromide – In freshwater, bromide is typically less than 0.05 mg/L. Therefore, it would be advisable to retest using a method with a lower detection limit. If an ozone-based water treatment system is proposed, it may be best to have the bromide level of less than 0.0063 mg/L to prevent the formation of bromates.    Additional Sampling at a lower detection limit – no health concern (OK).

Additional Comments
Lithium - was reported at < 200 ppb or 0.2 mg/L.  There are no current federal standards for lithium in drinking water. To protect human health, EPA estimated that a lithium concentration in a potable water supply should not exceed 700 μg/l or 0.7 mg/L.

Methane gas appears to have a thermogenic origin.

Other References
Document can not be copied in whole or part without the expressed written permission of Mr. Brian Oram, B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc. http://www.bfenvironmental.com


Do you want to make a positive change in PA - that will cost you NO Money?
Help Support the Citizens Groundwater and Surfacewater Database and Submit Your Baseline Data !