Comment
1. Without predrilling data, it is not possible to comment
on the cause for any water quality problems.
2. Where possible, I have noted situations where elevated
levels of a water quality parameter exists in Pennsylvania .
3. If duplicate analysis provided, I attempted to use the
highest reported value.
5. This is not about cause and effect; it is about a review
of the data.
6. A Well by Well - Review of the Data for Dimock, PA collected by EPA
Well – HW-24
With the exception of the following parameters, the
remaining values were reported as NOT Detected (U)
Anionic Surfactants
– < 0.01 mg/L – the secondary drinking water standard for foaming agents is
0.5 mg/L. (OK)
Barium – 0.139
mg/L – the primary drinking water standard for barium is 2.0 mg/L –– this does
not suggest any specific impact and barium is typically detectable in
non-saline impacted water at a level of less than 1 mg/L. (OK)
Boron – 0.251
mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is
available. EPA appears to have a long-term health advisory of 2.0 mg/L, but
other states have limits that range from 0.6 to 1 mg/L. Therefore, this does not appear to suggest
any form of impact. (OK)
Calcium- 1.31
mg/L (Total)– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is
available. (OK) – the value seems low.
Chloride – 6.63
mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is < 250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific
impact.
Chromium- < 0.002
mg/L (D) and the EPA/ PADEP primary drinking water standard is < 0.100 mg/L
(OK).
Copper –<
0.002 mg/L (OK)- the secondary drinking water standard is 1.0 mg/L and the
primary drinking water standard is 1.3 mg/L. (OK)
Ethane – < 0.0012
mg/L – No specific drinking water
standard (OK)
Fluoride – 0.359 mg/L
(OK) – drinking water standard is < 2 mg/L- PADEP drinking water standard is
2 mg/L.
Lithium – 0.204
mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is
available, but EPA has recommend a level be below 0.7 mg/L (OK)
Methane – 0.740 mg/L – No specific drinking water standard. (OK).
The
well water is not above the new action limit of 7 mg/L. For more details, go to http://www.water-research.net/methanegas.htm
Magnesium- < 0.500
mg/L (D)– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is
available. (OK)
Manganese– 0.0038
mg/L (Total)– Manganese is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the
action limit is 0.05 mg/L. Therefore,
the total manganese content does not exceed the secondary drinking water
standard. (OK)
Nickel – < 0.001
mg/L (D) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is
available, but the EPA has suggest a MCL of 0.1 mg/L. (OK)
Sodium –88.0 mg/L (D) – no specific drinking water standard
drinking water standard is available, but the EPA has added it to the Candidate
List to provide more analysis. The EPA’s
initial value of 20 mg/L has been clearly identified as not realistic. When chloride (salt is sodium chloride) is
present at a concentration of over 250 mg/L, the water can have an “off” taste.
At 400+ mg/L chloride, the water will taste definitely salty. (Source- Dr.
Brian Redmond, Professional Geologist). (OK)
Sulfate – 1.46
mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is < 250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific
impact.
Total Dissolved Solids – 189
mg/L – Total Dissolved Solids is
regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the
action limit is 500 mg/L.
Uranium – < 0.001 mg/L (Total) – Uranium is regulated as a primary
drinking water standard by the EPA and PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.030
mg/L. (OK)
Zinc
– < 0.002 mg/L (Total) – Zinc
is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the
action limit is 5.0 mg/L. (OK)
Ethylene glycol – the reported value is < 10 mg/L – there is
no standard, but the EPA has a guidance limit of < 7 mg/L. Other states have lower and higher standards:
At a minimum, I would recommend retesting for ethylene
glycol other other glycol compounds using a method that is more sensitive or
conducting some type of standard additions analysis.
No major problems
1. No major problem, but the presence of boron, lithium, and
higher sodium without a spike in an anion, suggests that there may be a source
of alkaline water. It would be
interesting to see the actual laboratory results that include total hardness,
alkalinity, and pH.
2. Retesting for glycols using a more sensitive technique is
recommended.
Document can not be
copied in whole or part without the expressed written permission of Mr. Brian
Oram, B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc. http://www.bfenvironmental.com
Do you want to make a positive change in PA - that will cost you NO Money?
Help Support the Citizens Groundwater and Surfacewater Database and Submit Your Baseline Data !
Free Information
on Drinking Water Quality - http://www.water-research.net
No comments:
Post a Comment