DEP Circulates Concept Paper On
Changes To Oil And Gas Drilling Regulations
|
On Wednesday the
Department of Environmental Protection issued a
concept
paper
to the agency’s Oil
and
Gas
Technical
Advisory
Board
on proposed changes to Pennsylvania’s Chapter 78 Oil and Gas Regulations
required by the Marcellus Shale drilling law adopted in February as Act
13.
The bulleted list of
proposed changes cover application requirements, well location restrictions,
proposed protection of water supplies, predrilling or prealteration survey
requirements, erosion and sedimentation controls, wastewater control and
disposal planning, standards for pit and tank containment and much
more.
DEP said proposed
language to implement these changes should be available online on or about
September 14.
DEP has scheduled two
additional Oil and Gas Board meetings to review these proposals on September 17
and October 15. The proposals will also be shared with DEP’s Small
Business
Compliance
Assistance
Advisory
Committee
on October 24.
DEP anticipates
finalizing proposed language at the November 15 Oil and Gas Board meeting and
then send it to the Environmental Quality Board on December 12 for their
consideration.
The Concept Paper
Key Parts of Interest
1.Propose adding a requirement that a well operator identify on the well permit application the location of abandoned gas or oil wells within 1000 feet of the entire well bore length.
2. Propose adding regulations to this section to ensure compliance with the 2012 Oil and Gas Act 58 Pa.C.S.§ 3218(a).
3. Propose adding language to the requirement of notifying the Department within 24 hours of any water supply complaints a well operator receives, that it be by electronic means.
4.Propose to require the submission of chain-of-custody documentation with the results of the laboratory analysis.
5.Propose requiring the development of a site-specific PPC plan. Also add the 2012 Oil and Gas Act requirement for unconventional wells to also have a site-specific containment plan noting which containment systems and equipment will be utilized to contain, control and prevent spills from leaving the well site.
6.Propose that the operator conduct continuous inspections of the drilling operations(including drilling pressures and fluid returns), all water bodies in close proximity, and the surrounding area for any signs an inadvertent return during horizontal drilling operations. Documentation of such inspections shall be made available to the Department upon request.
7. § 78.70. Roadspreading of Brine for Dust Control and Road Stabilization
Conventional Energy Related Systems
The conventional energy related systems program targets individuals that are working in the field of oil, coal, natural gas, and petrochemical processing. Courses timely topic that include natural gas development, carbon sequestering, and deep well injection.
Advanced Oil and Gas Exploration Technologies
Advanced Oil & Gas Drilling and Completion Technologies Building Envelope Air-tightness (New Course) Carbon Sequestration (New - Featured Program) Electrostatic Treating of Emulsions Fundamentals of Petroleum Refining Gas Pipeline Hydraulics Introduction to Underground Natural Gas Storage Land-Based Produced Water Re-injection Treatment Natural Gas Plant Operations Program (New - Featured Program) Liquid Pipeline Hydraulics Process Vessel Design for FPS Motion Underground Storage Tank Sump Maintenance
Natural Gas - Petroleum Engineer Training Program (New - Featured Program)
|
Grassroots Community based solutions for energy conservation, watershed management, alternative and renewable energy, biomass, stormwater management, land-based wastewater disposal, LEED-AP, Green Associate, continuing education training for professionals and water reuse, and outreach to Private Well Owners in the United States.
Blog Listings
Water Research - Private Well Owner Outreach Assistance
Friday, August 31, 2012
DEP Circulates Concept Paper On Changes To Oil And Gas Drilling Regulations
Occupational Safety and Health Administration Oil and Gas Industry
OSHA along with other Federal agencies schedule meeting to
discuss performance-based approaches to protect oil and gas industry
workers
WASHINGTON – The Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), along with the Bureau of Safety and Environmental
Enforcement, United States Coast Guard, Environmental Protection Agency, and
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration invite public
participation in a September 20-21 meeting on the use and implementation of
performance-based regulatory models for enhanced safety and environmental
performance in the United States oil and gas industry.
Speakers at the September 20-21 meeting in Texas City, Texas
will address the current regulatory landscape and discuss the challenges and
benefits of non-prescriptive, outcome-based approaches to reduce the frequency
and severity of harmful events.
Public attendees will have the opportunity to make comments
at the meeting and all members of the public may submit comments in writing.
Those interested in attending must register online by September 5. The meeting
will also be Webcast live for online viewing. For more information, visit the
registration website and read the Federal Register notice.
Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,
employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their
employees. OSHA’s role is to ensure these conditions for America’s working men
and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education
and assistance. For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov.
We offer a series of health and safety training courses
Program 1: Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)- OSHA Accepted Courses
New Program - OSHA Training Course for Well Drillers (0il and Gas Industry- 4 hour course)
Crystalline Silica - Silicosis- Safety Training Video
Mining Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) (Refresher)
A pdf file that contains a partial listing of the courses we offer - B.F. Environmental Training Program (Safety - OSHA).
Mining Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) (Refresher)
Low-cost, Low Maintenance Stormwater System Focus of NPS Demonstration Project
Release Date:
Friday, August 31, 2012
Contact:
Patrick Connolly, Chief of Maintenance
E-mail: Patrick_connolly@nps.gov
Office Phone: (570) 729-7137
Low-cost, Low Maintenance Stormwater System Focus of NPS
Demonstration Project
Partners
and local businesses are invited to observe installation of a stormwater
filtration system at the NPS Headquarters Office, 274 River Road , Beach Lake PA , on Thursday, September 6th at
1:00. The installer and park staff will talk with participants following
completion of the project, anticipated to take approximately one and a half
hours from start to finish. “Stormwater runoff can significantly threaten and
impair the health and enjoyment of our nation’s water resources, natural
habitats and scenic beauty, and we want to be a leader in finding affordable
ways to reduce that impact”, said Superintendent Sean McGuinness.
Recognizing
a need for inexpensive, relatively easily-installed and -maintained stormwater
filtration systems in the Upper
Delaware River Valley ,
National Park Service Superintendent Sean McGuinness seized the opportunity and
personally investigated options for an engineered stormwater filtration media
and delivery system for the NPS Headquarters office at 274 River Road , Beach Lake ,
Pennsylvania .
The
system is designed to be installed into existing roadside drains (commonly
called catch basins). Located just below the grate, they capture and filter the
water as it leaves the surrounding surfaces, thereby reducing source pollution.
“We were surprised at the elegant simplicity
of the system”, said McGuinness. This
application can be included in projects with a minimum investment. The cost of maintenance is also very low,
involving occasional vacuuming and geotextile bag replacement. “Stormwater filtration systems also assist municipalities,
agencies, storm water managers and contractors in meeting the Environmental
Protection Agency’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Phase II storm water regulations regarding runoff from new construction site
activities”, according to the manufacturer.
For
more information, contact Chief of Maintenance Pat Connolly at 570-729-7137.
Thursday, August 30, 2012
Marcellus Shale Coalition Pre-Drilling Water Sampling
Pittsburgh, Pa. – Today, the Marcellus Shale
Coalition (MSC) released a Recommended Practice (RP) for pre-drill water supply
surveys. This is the third in a series of recommended practices, all aimed at
reinforcing the MSC’s Guiding
Principles to “continuously improve our practices and seek transparency
in our operations” while furthering a fact-based dialogue that encourages
responsible American natural gas development.
Pennsylvania regulations require
natural gas producers to sample and test – with the owner’s consent – all water
supplies within 2,500 feet of a proposed Marcellus Shale natural gas well. These
pre-drill tests, which are conducted by certified laboratories, provide a
baseline analysis of water chemistry prior to site preparation and development
activities. Many natural gas producers test well beyond the 2,500 feet
requirement, and were doing so prior to Pennsylvania enacting these new
regulations.
According to the Center for Rural
Pennsylvania, nearly 40 percent of Pennsylvania’s water wells do not meet at
least one safe drinking water standard and another 20 percent of wells contain
pre-existing methane.
“For years, well before shale gas
production began in the Commonwealth, straightforward science has informed us
that Pennsylvania’s groundwater chemistry drastically varies across regions,”
said MSC president Kathryn Klaber. “This Recommended Practice builds upon what’s
required by law and lays out in great detail steps operators can take to help
ensure homeowners have a clear understanding of their water quality before
natural gas-related activities begin. These tests, paid for by the natural gas
producer, are shared with the well owners and state regulators, serving a
critical public health function in many cases.”
Developed by technical experts from a
host of MSC member companies, this RP recommends the following steps:
- A pre-drill survey should be
conducted on all identified water supplies within a given area of the well pad
surface location as required by the State Regulatory Agency
(SRA).
- Water supply sources such as wells,
springs and ponds should be evaluated prior to earth disturbance for site
construction or prior to spud. Consideration should also be given to sampling
water supply sources that are not currently in use.
- With the assistance of the water
supply owner, locate the water supply(ies) and sampling location(s). Use GPS
(preferably NAD83 datum) to determine and record the latitude and longitude of
each water supply.
- The samples shall be collected, in
accordance with all appropriate sample collection, preservation, handling, and
defensible chain-of-custody procedures. Appropriate sample collection procedures
can be found on the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
website (www.epa.gov).
- Water samples shall be analyzed by an
SRA certified laboratory using USEPA SW-846 methods or drinking water methods
(where drinking water methods exist). For parameters that have a Maximum
Contaminant Level (MCL), the laboratory should be instructed to provide a
laboratory reporting limit no greater than the published MCL.
- Operators should inform the water supply owners and/or residents that any and all information/data collected will be provided to the owner/occupant and to the SRA (if required by state regulations) and, as such, the information could be disclosed as public information upon inquiry to the SRA.
Continued Klaber: “Additionally, the MSC is developing a
robust pre-drill water quality database. When complete, this first of a kind
library will serve as an important environmental and public health tool to help
address water quality challenges that have persisted in rural communities for
decades.”
The parameters they recommended
Alkalinity
Total Chromium
Oil & Grease
Total Arsenic
pH
Total Barium
Specific Conductance
Total Lead
Total Dissolved Solids
Total Selenium
Total Suspended Solids
Total Strontium
Chloride
Total Calcium
Sulfate
Total Iron
Total Hardness
Total Magnesium
Surfactants (MBAS/foaming agents)
Total Manganese
Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylenes (BTEX)
Total Potassium
Dissolved Methane*
Total Sodium
Dissolved Ethane
E. Coli
Dissolved Propane
Total Coliform
Nitrate as N
Turbidity**
Comments
1. I am glad that a more uniform list is being recommended.
2. I would like to see the full range of VOCs and MTBE.
3. I would like to see glycols added to the list or at least added when the conditions seem correct.
4. I think the Guidance should include more on purging and documenting the water quality during the purging process to make sure the purge was adequate, but it is a good start.
5. During purging, the pH, mv or ORP, Conductivity, and Temperature should be documented. If possible, this is also a great time to measure turbidity.
6. I strongly recommend adding Total Aluminum to this testing.
7. I strongly recommend adding Bromide to this testing.
8. It would be nice if the guidance provided more information on detection limits, but I do like the fact that want the results reported in a uniform manner.
9. Would like to see testing for nuisance bacteria or heterotrophic bacteria when the conditions seem appropriate - probably 50% of the time.
B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc. provides training in proper baseline sampling practices, review and use of baseline testing data, and educating professionals to work with private well owners, plus we provide training and educational programs for private well owners.
B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc also does post drilling assessments and reviews.
The actual guidance document can be found here.
Thursday, August 23, 2012
Frustrated with Natural Gas Development Vandalism is NOT the Answer
"Possible
vandalism investigated after chemical spill at gas well site
By
Laura Legere (Staff Writer)
Published:
August 21, 2012
Police probing chemical spillState environmental regulators asked state police to help investigate a 100-gallon chemical spill at a natural gas well site in Susquehanna County on Monday after bullet casings and a bullet were found near a broken glass tube that caused the leak.
The spill of glycol was discovered by a worker Monday about 11:30 a.m. at Cabot Oil and Gas Corp.'s Grosvenor well site in Dimock Twp., Department of Environmental Protection spokeswoman Colleen Connolly said.
The chemical was largely contained to the well pad but a heavy rain raised the risk of runoff, she said. Absorbent material and a vacuum truck were sent to the site to clean up the fluid.The broken tube was connected to a 500-gallon tank of glycol, which is used as part of the dehydration process at the well site, she said.
The two Grosvenor wells were drilled in September 2010, according to state data. Ms. Connolly did not immediately know if there are active operations at the site."
Source of the article - http://thetimes-tribune.com/news/possible-vandalism-investigated-after-chemical-spill-at-gas-well-site-1.1361238
Saturday, August 18, 2012
Baseline Testing Results Wayne County Pennsylvania
Memo
August 18, 2012
To: Wayne County, Manchester Township, PA
18436
From: Brian Oram, PG
B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc.
Sample Information- Sample # 1 (Well)
Wayne County , Manchester Township
Site:
Drilled Well- no data
Purge Time –12/16/2010 at 12:15 am
Estimated –
Lab Number – XX-XXXX-20101216-PST - Test America / Tetra Tech
Parameter
|
Result
|
Standard
|
Comment
|
Ethylene Glycol
|
0.76 mg/L
|
< 0.3 to 14 mg/L R
|
Detection
Limit Issue |
Ethane
|
< 0.00049 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Ethene
|
< 0.00052 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Methane
|
< 0.00022 mg/L
|
< 7 mg/L
|
OK
|
Propane
|
< 0.010 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Surfactants (MBAS)
|
< 0.013 mg/L
|
< 0.5 mg/L
|
OK
|
T. Kjeldahl Nitrogen
|
< 0.15 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Radium 226
|
0.15 pCi/L
|
< 5 pCi/L
|
OK
|
Radium 228
|
0.06 pCi/L
|
< 5 pCi/L
|
OK
|
Gross Alpha
|
1.46 pCi/L
|
< 15 pCi/L
|
OK
|
Gross Beta
|
0.72 pCi/L
|
< 4 pCi/L
|
OK
|
Parameter
|
Result
|
Standard
|
Comment
|
Thorium
|
< 0.002 mg/L
|
see gross alpha
|
OK
|
Uranium
|
0.0011mg/L
|
< 0.030 mg/L
|
OK
|
Thallium
|
< 0.010 mg/L
|
< 0.002 mg/L
|
Detection Limit Issue
|
Silver
|
< 0.005 mg/L
|
< 0.05 to 0.10 mg/L
|
OK
|
Aluminum
|
< 0.200 mg/L
|
< 0.05 to < 0.2 mg/L
|
OK
|
Arsenic
|
< 0.010 mg/L
|
< 0.010 mg/L
|
OK
|
Barium
|
< 0.200 mg/L
|
< 2 mg/L
|
OK
|
Beryllium
|
< 0.004 mg/L
|
< 0.004 mg/L
|
OK
|
Boron
|
< 0.200 mg/L
|
< 0.6 mg/L R
|
OK
|
Calcium
|
28.4 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Cadmium
|
< 0.005 mg/L
|
< 0.005 mg/L
|
OK
|
Cobalt
|
< 0.050 mg/L
|
< 0.011 mg/L R
|
OK
|
Chromium
|
< 0.005 mg/L
|
< 0.1 mg/L
|
OK
|
Copper
|
0.0713 mg/L
|
< 1 mg/L
|
OK
|
Potassium
|
0.660 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Lithium
|
< 0.050 mg/L
|
< 0.7 mg/L R
|
OK
|
Magnesium
|
3.99 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Manganese
|
0.0012 mg/L
|
< 0.05 mg/L
|
OK
|
Mercury
|
< 0.0002 mg/L
|
< 0.002 mg/L
|
OK
|
Molybdenum
|
< 0.040 mg/L
|
< 0.040 mg/L R
|
OK
|
Sodium
|
4.56 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Nickel
|
< 0.040 mg/L
|
< 0.1 mg/L
|
OK
|
Lead
|
< 0.003 mg/L
|
< 0.005 mg/L
|
OK
|
Selenium
|
< 0.005 mg/L
|
< 0.05 mg/L
|
OK
|
Strontium
|
0.319 mg/L
|
< 4 mg/L R
|
OK
|
Zinc
|
0.0047 mg/L
|
< 5 mg/L
|
OK
|
Iron, T
|
< 0.100 mg/L
|
< 0.3 mg/L
|
OK
|
Iron, D
|
< 0.100 mg/L
|
< 0.3 mg/L
|
OK
|
Parameter
|
Result
|
Standard
|
Comment
|
pH
|
7.4
|
6.5 - 8.5
|
OK
|
Acidity
|
< 5 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Ammonia Nitrogen
|
0.17 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Bromide
|
< 0.20 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Chloride
|
6 mg/L
|
< 250 mg/L
|
OK
|
Hardness, T
|
84 mg CaCO3/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Nitrate-Nitrite
|
0.17 mg/L
|
< 10 mg/L
|
OK
|
Oil and Grease
|
< 4.8 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Conductance
|
230 uS/cm
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Sulfate
|
6.7 mg/L
|
< 250 mg/L
|
OK
|
T. Alkalinity
|
80.3 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
T. Dissolved Solids
|
111
|
< 500 mg/L
|
OK
|
Ratio TDS/ Conductivity
|
0.48
|
*****
|
OK
|
Total Rec. Phenolics
|
< 0.010 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
T. Suspended Solids
|
< 4 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Parameter
|
Result
|
Standard
|
Comment
|
Benzene
|
< 0.005 mg/L
|
< 0.005 mg/L
|
OK
|
Ethylbenzene
|
< 0.005 mg/L
|
< 0.700 mg/L
|
OK
|
Toluene
|
< 0.005 mg/L
|
< 1.0 mg/L
|
OK
|
T. Xylenes
|
< 0.015 mg/L
|
< 10 mg/L
|
OK
|
alpha-BHC
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
beta-BHC
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
delta-BHC
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Lindane
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
< 0.0002 mg/L
|
OK
|
Heptachlor
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
< 0.0004 mg/L
|
OK
|
Aldrin
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Heptachlor epoxide
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
< 0.0002 mg/L
|
OK
|
Endosulfan I
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Dieldrin
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
4, 4' DDE
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Endrin
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
< 0.002 mg/L
|
OK
|
Endrin Ketone
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Endrin Aldephyde
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Endosulfan II
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
4,4'-DDD
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Endosulfan sulfate
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
4,4'-DDT
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Methoxychlor
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
< 0.040 mg/L
|
OK
|
alpha Chlordane
|
< 0.000095 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
gamma Chlordane
|
< 0.000048 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Toxaphene
|
< 0.0038 mg/L
|
< 0.003 mg/L
|
OK
|
2,4-D
|
< 0.0038 mg/L
|
< 0.070 mg/L
|
OK
|
Dalapon
|
< 0.0048mg/L
|
< 0.2 mg/L
|
OK
|
2,4-DB
|
< 0.0038 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Dicamba
|
< 0.0019 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Dichlorprop
|
< 0.0038 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Dinoseb
|
< 0.00086 mg/L
|
< 0.007 mg/L
|
OK
|
MCPA
|
< 0.380 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
MCPP
|
< 0.380 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
Pentachlorophenol
|
< 0.00048 mg/L
|
< 0.001 mg/L
|
OK
|
Silvex
|
< 0.00095 mg/L
|
< 0.050 mg/L
|
OK
|
2,4,5-T
|
< 0.00095 mg/L
|
no standard
|
OK
|
The following are my general comments:
1. Based on the
available data, I do not see any specific problems or concerns.
2. It would have
been advisable to test for more of the regulated and unregulated volatile
organics and MTBE. They only tested for
BTEX (Bold).
3. It would have
been good if the arsenic was tested to a lower detection limit.
4. The letter R-
means it was a recommended standard – not regulated.
5. Ethylene
glycol – the method did not have a detection limit that is below the lowest
standard for a state in the United
States .
There is no Federal Drinking Water Standard. The same comment applies to
Cobalt.
6. Thallium – the
detection limit was not below the limit for the Safe Drinking Water Act.
Recommend
retesting.
Thanks for
supporting the Citizens Groundwater Database - Submit your data today - get a free evaluation and help your community.
I would like to personally thank Sylcosan Inc. Manchester Wayne County PA and a proud member of the NWPOA for releasing data to the Citizens Database.
Thanks for Helping to Track Change in Pennsylvania
Mr. Brian Oram, PG
Water-Research Center – Free Information on Water
Quality
Questions – 570-335-1947
Please Participate in Our Private Well Survey at:
If you would like a free booklet on Private Well Water
Quality, go to:
http://www.bfenvironmental.com/pdfs/Waterbooklet070610.pdf
Looking to Support this Effort - We could use the help !
Looking to Support this Effort - We could use the help !
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)