Showing posts with label barium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label barium. Show all posts

Saturday, August 18, 2012

Hallstead Susquehanna County Baseline Water Testing Arsenic Barium Strontium



Sample Information- Sample # 1 (Well)
Susquehanna County, Hallstead Borough
Site: No release
Drilled Well- 250 feet, drilled in 1993 – no treatment
Purge Time – 10:38 to 11:15 am
Estimated – Latitude/ Longitude (No release to Public - Data only in Database)

Lab Number – XXXXXXXX (Microbac Lab- Lab ID - 1208032)
3/22/2012 at 11:15 am
Parameter                                 Result               Action / Regulated      Comment
pH  (field- f)                             7.29                             6.5 to 8.5                    OK
ORP (f) (mv)                            + 344                           no standard                 OK
Conductivity (f)(uS/cm)          194 uS/cm                   no standard                    OK
Est. TDS* (f) (mg/L)              126 mg/L                     < 500 mg/L                OK
Temperature (f) (C)               8.79 C                         no standard                     OK
Odor                                        NONE                         < 3                          OK
Color                                       Clear                           no standard                   OK
Dissolved Oxygen                  10.07 mg/L                  no standard                     OK
(f)(mg/L)

Arsenic                                   0.0013 mg/L                < 0.010 mg/L              OK
Barium                                    0.15 mg/L                    < 2 mg/L                     OK
Chloride                                  1.35 mg/L                    < 250 mg/L                 OK
Ethane                                    < 0.005 mg/L              no standard                   OK
Methane                                 < 0.005 mg/L              < 7 mg/L                   OK
Sodium                                    13 mg/L                       no standard                    OK
Strontium                                0.35 mg/L                    no standard                     OK
Turbidity                                 1.1 mg/L                      < 5 ntu                         OK

The following are my general comments:

1. Aeration device on sink was not removed- it would have been better for the sampler to select an alternative sampling site.  The high dissolved oxygen value suggests re-aeration was occurring.

2. It would have been better for the laboratory to conduct an analysis for total dissolved solids rather than estimating a value based on the conductivity reading.   The value is only a good estimate.

3. It is very good that the sampler noted the lack of odor and color.

4. Because of the estimated total dissolved solids, it would have been advisable to test the water for total hardness, iron, and manganese.   This is further supported by the fact that the water had a turbidity of 1.1 ntu.  This suggests there could be some reduced iron and manganese in the water.

5. In the field log – the sampler does not provide the units for the field measurements, but they appear to correct for this in the report.  It would have been best to have this on the field data sheet.

6. It is very good that you had the water tested for arsenic.

7. Overall, the screening test was very good.  There does seem to be a few parameters lacking, but this could be corrected by conducting some additional testing or making sure to allow a natural gas company to sample your water.

The primary issues with natural gas development have been associated with methane gas migration (Your OK), discolored water (your are lacking testing for iron and manganese),  and the potential for saltwater migration (Your OK).  In addition, it has been suggested that bromide may be a good secondary indicator for saline water and drilling mud migration.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank your fellow private well owner for releasing this data to help other well owners in the area.  Thanks for supporting the Citizens Groundwater Database a free program in Pennsylvania.

Reviewed by:

Mr. Brian Oram, PG
Water-Research Center – Free Information on Water Quality
Questions – 570-335-1947

Please Participate in Our Private Well Survey at:

If you would like a free booklet on Private Well Water Quality, go to:


Sunday, July 1, 2012

Baseline Water Testing for New York State


This is a list of parameter for wells outside the 1000 foot radius around a well and not along a horizontal leg.  I do not agree with the PSU recommendations from 2008 and the updated listing in 2011 and the recommendations from CSI are still missing some key parameters.    For the record, I still do not understand the chemical oxygen demand and Total Organic Carbon. recommendation by the CSI.

This is a general list of test packages.  Please remember baseline water testing is not a one size fits all program.  The actual testing that you need depends on your health, your water source, your surrounding land-use, the history for your area, and what is planned in the near future.  Also, please note that this list evolved back in 2008 and we had been recommending key parameters like bromide, multiple gases, aluminum, and others since 2008/2009.

This approach ranges in cost from about $ 350 to over $ 1000.00.

Testing Package # 1
This package is recommended as a screening for post gas development or screening for wells that are not a long a major roadway or areas that have not been leased.
Parameters
Total Coliform with e. coli confirmation, chloride, sodium, bromide, barium, pH, ORP, total dissolved solids, MBAS, iron, manganese, and methane/ethane/propane and other gases..

Testing Package # 2
This is the minimum package I recommend for the area- this is based on PADEP recommendations, plus I added Arsenic and Nitrate.  Note- If nitrate is at or greater than 1 mg NO3-N/L - I would recommend adding Nitrite.
Parameters
Package # 1- plus Aluminum, T. Hardness, Magnesium, Strontium, Conductivity, Calcium, Zinc, Alkalinity, Arsenic, Nitrate, Total Suspended Solids, Sulfate, Oil & Grease, 21-VOCs/MTBE, Selenium

Testing Package # 3
More Comprehensive- Assuming the wells are outside 1000 feet of a well site and not along a horizontal leg
Package # 2 - plus Potassium, Sulfide, Ammonia, Acidity, Nickel, Gross, Alpha/Beta, Lead, and Uranium.

Possible Addons- Based on available frac water data- this would be more appropriate for wells within 1000 feet or less.
Radium 226 and Radium 228- if alpha or Uranium is high.
Turbidity- cheap screening test
Phenol and phenolic compounds- located near well or along major road
Chemical Oxygen Demand - DO Not Recommend
Total Organic Carbon- DO Not Recommend
2- Butanone (methyl ethyl ketone)
Naphthalene
Phthalates- this may be a problem already for private wells with PVC casing or substand piping.
Ethylene Glycol and other Glycols- recommend
1,2- Propanediol - I think this is being used by some as an alternative to ethylene glycol
Methylchloride
Acetone - may be source because of a break down in 1,2- Propanediol
Acetophenone
Lithium- Recommend
Thallium reviewing
2-Methylnaphthalene
SOCs

Schedule a Sampling Event

Other Post on the subject
http://pennsylvania-solutions.blogspot.com/2010/07/getting-waters-tested-informational-and.html

Training - Third Party Baseline Samplers

Other Programs
1. Schedule a Private Well Owner Workshop - Learn How to Review Your Water Quality Testing Results, Select Parameters, Screen Your Well Water Quality, and Much More.

2. Well by Well Review of Dimock, PA

Co-Authored - New Publication on Water Quality for Private Well Owners- Website - http://www.bfenvironmental.com/links.php
http://www.bfenvironmental.com/pdfs/Waterbooklet070610.pdf


Website provided for information only and the site is always under development and subject to change.

Thanks

Brian Oram, Professional Geologist
B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc.
Water-Research.net


Sunday, June 17, 2012

Dimock Pennsylvania Well Water Quality


Comment

1. Without predrilling data, it is not possible to comment on the cause for any water quality problems.
2. Where possible, I have noted situations where elevated levels of a water quality parameter exists in Pennsylvania.
3. If duplicate analysis provided, I attempted to use the highest reported value.
5. This is not about cause and effect; it is about a review of the data.

Well – HW-18 (1/30/2012)

With the exception of the following parameters, the remaining values were reported as NOT Detected (U)

Heterotrophic Bacteria – 73 colonies per 100 ml ( I do not understand the J value).  The drinking water limit is < 500 colonies per 100 ml (OK).

Total Coliform < 1 colony per 100 ml (OK)

Aluminum – 0.0346 mg/L (Total) and < 0.030 mg/L (D)- drinking water standard ranges from 0.05 to 0.2 mg/L.   This parameter is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard, because of aesthetic reasons.   The treated water level of aluminum is < 0.030 mg/L.  (OK)

Anionic Surfactants –< 0.01 mg/L – the secondary drinking water standard for foaming agents is 0.5 mg/L.  (OK)

Arsenic – 0.0022 mg/L – drinking water standard is <  0.010 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact and arsenic is a common problem in NEPA – about 6 % of private wells have arsenic above 0.010 mg/L.  The treated water level of arsenic was 0.0021 mg/L and treated and filtered 0.0026 mg/L.  (Ok – monitoring recommended)

Barium – 0.276 mg/L – the primary drinking water standard for barium is 2.0 mg/L –– this does not suggest any specific impact and barium is typically detectable in non-saline impacted water at a level of less than 1 mg/L. After treatment, the concentration is 0.309 mg/L.  (OK)

Bromide – < 0.5 mg/L - In freshwater, bromide is typically less than 0.05 mg/L. Therefore, it would be advisable to retest using a method with a lower detection limit.
 Other References

Boron –0.186 mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available. EPA appears to have a long-term health advisory of 2.0 mg/L, but other states have limits that range from 0.6 to 1 mg/L.   Therefore, this does not appear to suggest any form of impact.  (OK- but monitoring advisable)

Calcium- 16.0 mg/L (Total)– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  After treatment, the level of Calcium is 18.3 mg/L.(OK)

Chloride –2.84 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.   After treatment, the reported value was 5.05 mg/L (OK).

Chromium-< 0.002 mg/L (D) and the EPA/ PADEP primary drinking water standard is
< 0.100 mg/L (OK).

Copper – < 0.002 mg/L  (Untreated) - the secondary drinking water standard is 1.0 mg/L and the primary drinking water standard is 1.3 mg/L. (OK)  At the tap the level was 0.0078 mg/L – this suggests there is some level of corrosion and leaching of copper in the plumbing for the home.

Ethane –< 0.0012 mg/L  – No specific drinking water standard (OK)

Fluoride – 0.117 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is < 2 mg/L- PADEP drinking water standard is 2 mg/L.   After treatment, the reported value was 0.26 mg/L (OK).

Iron – < 0.100 mg/L (Total)) – Iron is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.3 mg/L.  Therefore, the total iron content does not exceed the secondary drinking water standard.  (OK)

Lead – < 0.001 mg/L (Total) - Lead is regulated as a primary standard (EPA and PA) at 0.015 mg/L, but the action level in PA for source water is 0.005 mg/L. (OK)

Lithium – < 0.200 mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but EPA has recommend a level be below 0.7 mg/L    (OK)

Methane –  0.190 mg/L   – No specific drinking water standard. The well water is below the new action limit of 7 mg/L.   After treatment, the level of methane is 0.160 mg/L. For more details, go to http://www.water-research.net/methanegas.htm

Magnesium-2.73 mg/L– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK)  The treated water level of magnesium was 3.07 mg/L.

Manganese– 0.0062 mg/L (Total) – Manganese is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.05 mg/L.  Therefore, the total manganese content does not exceed the secondary drinking water standard.   After treatment the level is 0.0078 mg/L. (OK)

Nickel – < 0.001 mg/L  – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard
is available, but the EPA has suggest a MCL of 0.1 mg/L.   (OK) 

Potassium – <  2.0 mg/L (Total–  no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available (Ok)

Sodium –45.6  mg/L  – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but the EPA has added it to the Candidate List to provide more analysis.  The EPA’s initial value of 20 mg/L has been clearly identified as not realistic.  When chloride (salt is sodium chloride) is present at a concentration of over 250 mg/L, the water can have an “off” taste. At 400+ mg/L chloride, the water will taste definitely salty. (Source- Dr. Brian Redmond, Professional Geologist).  After treatment, the level was 37.0 mg/L. (OK)

Sulfate –7.53 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Strontium – 0.954 mg/L   – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but it is on the EPA Candidate List.  The EPA recommends that drinking water levels of nonradioactive strontium should not be more than 4 mg/L.  The report limit is consistent with background levels in Northeastern Pennsylvania.  If the background level was above 4 mg/L, it would be advisable to test for radiological parameters, especially alpha/beta.  (OK)  After treatment, the level is 1.09 mg/L.

Total Dissolved Solids  – 138 mg/L   – Total Dissolved Solids is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 500 mg/L.  After treatment the level was 73 mg/L- this value seems to be low (OK).

Total Suspended Solids - < 10 mg/L – no standard, but would recommend retesting to obtain a lower detection limit.

Uranium –0.001 mg/L (Total) – Uranium is regulated as a primary drinking water standard by the EPA and PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.030 mg/L.  (OK)

Zinc  –< 0.002 mg/L – Zinc is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 5.0 mg/L.  (OK)

Nitrate+Nitrite- N – < 0.05 mg/L, this is well below the EPA / PADEP drinking water limit of 10mg N/L for nitrate-N and would also be below the limit of 1.0 mg N/L for nitrite-N. (OK)

Acetone - the reported value was < 0.002 mg/L.  PADEP has a Medium Specific Concentration (MSC) for aquifers with a TDS of < 2500 mg/L of 33.0 mg/L and Massachusetts appears to have a drinking water standard of 6.3 mg/L. (OK)  The value in the treated water was  < 0.0033 mg/L (Not your why the detection limit changed).

Bromoform – < 0.0005 mg/L – the Total Trihalomethane Group has a limit of 0.08 mg/L, but bromoform should be less than 0.004 mg/L.  (OK)

Methyl ethyl ketone – < 0.002 mg/L in the treated water and untreated water. (OK)
Methyl ethyl ketone is a colorless volatile liquid that is soluble in water. The odor threshold for methyl ethyl ketone is 5.4 parts per million (ppm), with an acetone-like odor reported. Methyl ethyl ketone is also referred to as 2-butanone.   The EPA and PADEP has not set a drinking water standard, but it appears that Massachusetts has set a level of 4 mg/L.
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/hlthef/methylet.html

Ethylene glycol –  the reported value is < 10 mg/L – there is not standard, but the EPA has a guidance limit of < 7 mg/L.  Other states have lower and higher standards:

New Jersey 0.300 mg/L (300 ppb)
Arizona 5.5 mg/L (5500 ppb)
New Hampshire 7.0 mg/L (7000 ppb)
Florida, Massachusetts, and Minnesota14.0 mg/L (14,000 ppb)
Minnesota

At a minimum, I would recommend:

a.  retesting for ethylene glycol other and glycol-type compounds using a method that is more sensitive or conducting some type of standard additions analysis;
b. retesting total dissolved solids; and
c. monitoring arsenic, retesting bromide to a lower level, and monitoring strontium


Annual Water Testing 

Watercheck with Pesticide Option (Order Online)- This informational testing package will check for 103 contaminants in your well water.  These contaminants include Bacteria, (19) Heavy Metals & Minerals, (6) Other Inorganic Chemicals, (5) Physical Characteristics, (4) Trihalomethanes (disinfection by-products), (47) Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs), and (20) Pesticides, Herbicides and PCBs.  This package works well for well water customers (Code 9002)- $ 206.00, plus shipping - Request information .

Add Methane (Order from us) - We can do a methane, ethane, propane - test for about $ 100.00 
( self collection)-Request information .
This document can not be copied in whole or part without the expressed written permission of Mr. Brian Oram, B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc. http://www.bfenvironmental.com

Do you want to make a positive change in PA - that will cost you NO Money?
Help Support the Citizens Groundwater and Surfacewater Database and Submit Your Baseline Data !

 Free Information on Drinking Water Quality - http://www.water-research.net

arsenic, bromide, strontium, glycols, uranium, barium, aluminium, standard  plate count, Dimock PA Well Water

Sunday, May 20, 2012

HW-15 Methane, Manganese, Barium, Strontium, dimethyl phthalate , sodium, arsenic Biogenic


Comment

1. Without predrilling data, it is not possible to comment on the cause for any water quality problems.
2. Where possible, I have noted situations where elevated levels of a water quality parameter exists in Pennsylvania.
3. If duplicate analysis provided, I attempted to use the highest reported value.
5. This is not about cause and effect; it is about a review of the data.

Well – HW-15 (2/7/2012)

With the exception of the following parameters, the remaining values were reported as NOT Detected (U)

Anionic Surfactants – < 0.01 mg/L – the secondary drinking water standard for foaming agents is 0.5 mg/L.  (OK)

Arsenic – 0.0053 mg/L – drinking water standard is <  0.010 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact and arsenic is a common problem in NEPA – about 6 % of private wells have arsenic above 0.010 mg/L.  The treated water level of arsenic was 0.0033 mg/L and treated and filtered 0.0028 mg/L.  (Ok – monitoring recommended)

Barium – 0.582 mg/L – the primary drinking water standard for barium is 2.0 mg/L –– this does not suggest any specific impact and barium is typically detectable in non-saline impacted water at a level of less than 1 mg/L. (OK)
It appears the treatment system has reduced the level to 0.0184 mg/L.

Boron –< 0.050 mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available. EPA appears to have a long-term health advisory of 2.0 mg/L, but other states have limits that range from 0.6 to 1 mg/L.   Therefore, this does not appear to suggest any form of impact.  (OK)

Calcium- 31.9 mg/L (Total)– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK) – the value seems low.  The treatment system has reduced the level to 1.56 mg/L.

Chloride –15.6 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Chromium-0.0022 mg/L (D) and the EPA/ PADEP primary drinking water standard is
< 0.100 mg/L (OK).

Copper – 0.002 mg/L  (Untreated) - the secondary drinking water standard is 1.0 mg/L and the primary drinking water standard is 1.3 mg/L. (OK)  At the tap the level was 0.0134 mg/L – this suggests there is some level of corrosion and leaching of copper in the plumbing for the home.

Ethane –0.130 mg/L  – No specific drinking water standard (OK)

Fluoride – < 0.1 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is < 2 mg/L- PADEP drinking water standard is 2 mg/L.

Iron – 0.109 mg/L (Total)) – Iron is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.3 mg/L.  Therefore, the total iron content does not exceed the secondary drinking water standard.  (OK)  After water treatment the level was < 0.100 mg/L.

Lead – < 0.001 mg/L (Total) - Lead is regulated as a primary standard (EPA and PA) at 0.015 mg/L, but the action level in PA for source water is 0.005 mg/L. (OK)

Lithium – < 0.200 mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but EPA has recommend a level be below 0.7 mg/L    (OK)

Methane –  14 mg/L   – No specific drinking water standard. (Action Needed). The well water is above the new action limit of 7 mg/L- The well should be actively vented, but it may be advisable to evaluate a structural modification to the well and changing the pumping system. For more details, go to http://www.water-research.net/methanegas.htm

Note – It appears the well water is treated and the treated water methane was 0.027 mg/L.

Magnesium-10.3 mg/L– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK)  The treated water level of magnesium was 0.629 mg/L.

Manganese– 0.160 mg/L (Total) – Manganese is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.05 mg/L.  Therefore, the total manganese content does exceed the secondary drinking water standard.  Some intermittent problems with discolored water may occur – additional monitoring recommended.   (Elevated)   After treatment the level is < 0.001 mg/L.

Nickel – 0.0014 mg/L  – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard
is available, but the EPA has suggest a MCL of 0.1 mg/L.   (OK)  After treatment the
level was not detectable.

Sodium –16.9  mg/L  – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but the EPA has added it to the Candidate List to provide more analysis.  The EPA’s initial value of 20 mg/L has been clearly identified as not realistic.  When chloride (salt is sodium chloride) is present at a concentration of over 250 mg/L, the water can have an “off” taste. At 400+ mg/L chloride, the water will taste definitely salty. (Source- Dr. Brian Redmond, Professional Geologist). (OK)  After treatment, the level was 66.00 mg/L – this suggests that the treatment system probably includes a water softener that uses a sodium based salt.

Sulfate –3.95 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Strontium – 0.803 mg/L   – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but it is on the EPA Candidate List.  The EPA recommends that drinking water levels of nonradioactive strontium should not be more than 4 mg/L.  The report limit is consistent with background levels in Northeastern Pennsylvania.  If the background level was above 4 mg/L, it would be advisable to test for radiological parameters, especially alpha/beta.  (OK)  After treatment, the level is < 0.200 mg/L.

Total Dissolved Solids  – 158 mg/L   – Total Dissolved Solids is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 500 mg/L.  After treatment the level was 175 mg/L.

Total Suspended Solids - < 10 mg/L – no standard, but would recommend retesting to obtain a lower detection limit.

Uranium –0.0012 mg/L (Total) – Uranium is regulated as a primary drinking water standard by the EPA and PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.030 mg/L.  (OK)

Zinc  –< 0.002 mg/L – Zinc is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 5.0 mg/L.  (OK)

Nitrate+Nitrite- N – < 0.05 mg/L, this is well below the EPA / PADEP drinking water limit of 10mg N/L for nitrate-N and would also be below the limit of 1.0 mg N/L for nitrite-N. (OK)

dimethyl phthalate – the reported value was 0.00001 mg/L (J- value - actually below the detection limit of  < 0.005 mg/L-and the reported trigger limit is 1.4 mg/L. Florida has a health advisory level of 70 mg/L for dimethyl phthalate.  This hit was reported on the treated water – this would suggest that it could be related to the plumbing and piping and not the well water quality (OK)


Ethylene glycol –  the reported value is < 10 mg/L – there is not standard, but the EPA has a guidance limit of < 7 mg/L.  Other states have lower and higher standards:

New Jersey 0.300 mg/L (300 ppb)
Arizona 5.5 mg/L (5500 ppb)
New Hampshire 7.0 mg/L (7000 ppb)
Florida, Massachusetts, and Minnesota14.0 mg/L (14,000 ppb)
Minnesota

At a minimum, I would recommend retesting for ethylene glycol other and glycol-type compounds using a method that is more sensitive or conducting some type of standard additions analysis.

1. Methane was present at a level that is above the action limit of 7 mg/L and approaching a limit of 20 mg/L.  Action is needed.  Since the ratio of methane/ethane (C1/C2) is 107 – this would suggest that the gas is of biogenic origin.

2. dimethyl phthalate hits was suggested, but the reported values were actually below the method detection limit.  This suggests that additional monitoring may be advisable.

3. Detect for dimethyl phthalate after treatment suggest that this may be related to recent repairs or changes in the plumbing for the home.

4.The house appears to have a treatment system that is likely a sodium based water softener that reduces the level of barium, strontium, calcium, magnesium, iron, and manganese.  Because of the elevated level of manganese in the raw water, the system was probably installed because of the manganese.

5. The copper is  higher after treatment than in the raw water, this could suggest an internal corrosion related problem in the piping of the home.


Annual Water Testing 

Watercheck with Pesticide Option (Order Online)- This informational testing package will check for 103 contaminants in your well water.  These contaminants include Bacteria, (19) Heavy Metals & Minerals, (6) Other Inorganic Chemicals, (5) Physical Characteristics, (4) Trihalomethanes (disinfection by-products), (47) Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs), and (20) Pesticides, Herbicides and PCBs.  This package works well for well water customers (Code 9002)- $ 206.00, plus shipping - Request information .

Add Methane (Order from us) - We can do a methane, ethane, propane - test for about $ 100.00 
( self collection)-Request information .
Document can not be copied in whole or part without the expressed written permission of Mr. Brian Oram, B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc. http://www.bfenvironmental.com

Do you want to make a positive change in PA - that will cost you NO Money?
Help Support the Citizens Groundwater and Surfacewater Database and Submit Your Baseline Data !

 Free Information on Drinking Water Quality - http://www.water-research.net



Saturday, May 19, 2012

Dimock Pennsylvania Water Contamination EPA Testing Water On Fire

A fact based review - Well by Well of the Available Well Water Data for the Dimock Area that was generated by the EPA.    I was not involved with the sampling, but I was on-site during the sampling and field evaluation of one home.  I was invited by the homeowner.   We are still in the process of reviewing the data.  The main goal of this evaluation is to understand the nature of the regional water quality and to provide a fact based review of the data.   The results are compared the EPA and Pennsylvania Drinking Water Standards.  If no standard was available, we searched for a standard that has been established by another state or the World Health Organization.

HW-1 Dimock Private Well Marcellus Shale EPA Sampling January 2012
http://pennsylvania-solutions.blogspot.com/2012/04/hw-1-dimock-private-well-marcellus.html

Dimock Well – HW-02 January 25, 2012 - a review of the data


HW-3 EPA Dimock methyl ethyl ketone MEK 2-Butanone carbon disulfide Caprolactam methane iron


EPA Dimock Well Water Pennsylvania Water Quality Dimock HW-4 Janurary 2012 EPA Data Private Well Review by Oram- Barium, Iron, Lead, Benzo(a)pyrene, 4-Bromopheyl-Phenyl Ether, Fluoranthene,


HW- 5 EPA Dimock Iron methane barium well water PA


HW-6 Dimock Data EPA barium, copper, methane, nickel, thermogenic


Well Water Dimock Pennsylvania HW-7 February 2012 EPA barium, manganese, lead, copper, nickel, zinc


Dimock EPA Private Well Data HW-8 glycols, bacteria, copper, lead, methane, acetone, Anthracene


Dimock Well Water HW-9 Acetone, Arsenic, Barium, Copper, Lead, Lithium, ethane, methane, glycols Pennsylvania


HW-11 Dimock Water Quality Methane, Acetone, Methyl ethyl ketone, Manganese, glycols, barium, strontium, uranium, thermogenic


Well – HW-12 Dimock 1/26/2012 A Review-  Arsenic, Boron, Barium, Iron, Manganse, Nickel, Strontium, Uranium, Methane, Chloroethane, Methyl Chloride


HW-13 Dimock Data EPA January 30, 2012


HW-14 EPA Dimock Data Review January 2012 Biogenic Gas


Dimock HW-17 arsenic, barium, methane, uranium, thermogenic gasEPA Findings


HW-19 Dimock Data Review - EPA Findings - barium, chloride, phthalates


Dimock HW-24 boron fluoride methane lithium barium glycols

Annual Water Testing 

Watercheck with Pesticide Option (Order Online)- This informational testing package will check for 103 contaminants in your well water.  These contaminants include Bacteria, (19) Heavy Metals & Minerals, (6) Other Inorganic Chemicals, (5) Physical Characteristics, (4) Trihalomethanes (disinfection by-products), (47) Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs), and (20) Pesticides, Herbicides and PCBs.  This package works well for well water customers (Code 9002)- $ 206.00, plus shipping - Request information .

Add Methane (Order from us) - We can do a methane, ethane, propane - test for about $ 100.00 
( self collection)-Request information .


For free Information on Water Quality - Go to http://www.water-research.net

Document can not be copied in whole or part without the expressed written permission of Mr. Brian Oram, B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc. http://www.bfenvironmental.com

Do you want to make a positive change in PA - that will cost you NO Money- Yes it is FREE

Help Support the Citizens Groundwater and Surfacewater Database and Submit Your Baseline Data FOR FREE !


Thursday, May 17, 2012

HW-11 Dimock Water Quality Methane, Acetone, Methyl ethyl ketone, Manganese, glycols, barium, strontium, uranium, thermogenic



Comment

1. Without predrilling data, it is not possible to comment on the cause for any water quality problems.
2. Where possible, I have noted situations where elevated levels of a water quality parameter exists in Pennsylvania.
3. If duplicate analysis provided, I attempted to use the highest reported value.
5. This is not about cause and effect; it is about a review of the data.
6. Note- Suspected detects for acetone and ketone were after the treatment system and not before treatment.
7. Treatment system appears to reduce the methane to well below any action limit.

Well – HW-11 (2/13/2012)

With the exception of the following parameters, the remaining values were reported as NOT Detected (U)

Anionic Surfactants – < 0.01 mg/L – the secondary drinking water standard for foaming agents is 0.5 mg/L.  (OK)

Arsenic – < 0.001 mg/L – drinking water standard is <  0.010 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact and arsenic is a common problem in NEPA – about 6 % of private wells have arsenic above 0.010 mg/L. 

Barium – 0.164 mg/L – the primary drinking water standard for barium is 2.0 mg/L –– this does not suggest any specific impact and barium is typically detectable in non-saline impacted water at a level of less than 1 mg/L. (OK)

Boron –< 0.050 mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available. EPA appears to have a long-term health advisory of 2.0 mg/L, but other states have limits that range from 0.6 to 1 mg/L.   Therefore, this does not appear to suggest any form of impact.  (OK)

Calcium- 35.5 mg/L (Total)– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK) – the value seems low.

Chloride –7.24 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Chromium- < 0.002 mg/L (D) and the EPA/ PADEP primary drinking water standard is < 0.100 mg/L (OK).

Copper – < 0.002 mg/L  (Untreated) - the secondary drinking water standard is 1.0 mg/L and the primary drinking water standard is 1.3 mg/L. (OK)

Ethane –0.320 mg/L  – No specific drinking water standard (OK)

Fluoride – < 0.1 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is < 2 mg/L- PADEP drinking water standard is 2 mg/L.

Iron – < 0.100 mg/L (Total)) – Iron is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.3 mg/L.  Therefore, the total iron content does not exceed the secondary drinking water standard.  (OK)

Lead – < 0.001 mg/L (Total) - Lead is regulated as a primary standard (EPA and PA) at 0.015 mg/L, but the action level in PA for source water is 0.005 mg/L. (OK)

Lithium – < 0.200 mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but EPA has recommend a level be below 0.7 mg/L    (OK)

Methane –  22 mg/L   – No specific drinking water standard. (Action is needed). The well water is above the new action limit of 7 mg/L- The well should be actively vented, but it may be advisable to evaluate a structural modification to the well and changing the pumping system. For more details, go to http://www.water-research.net/methanegas.htm

Magnesium-8.13 mg/L– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK)

Manganese– 0.0457 mg/L (Total) – Manganese is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.05 mg/L.  Therefore, the total manganese content does Not exceed the secondary drinking water standard, but it is approaching the value.  Some intermittent problems with discolored water may occur – additional monitoring recommended.   (OK)

Nickel – 0.0014 mg/L  – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard
is available, but the EPA has suggest a MCL of 0.1 mg/L.   (OK)

Sodium –8.48  mg/L  – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but the EPA has added it to the Candidate List to provide more analysis.  The EPA’s initial value of 20 mg/L has been clearly identified as not realistic.  When chloride (salt is sodium chloride) is present at a concentration of over 250 mg/L, the water can have an “off” taste. At 400+ mg/L chloride, the water will taste definitely salty. (Source- Dr. Brian Redmond, Professional Geologist). (OK)

Sulfate –13. 7 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Strontium – 0.469 mg/L   – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but it is on the EPA Candidate List.  The EPA recommends that drinking water levels of nonradioactive strontium should not be more than 4 mg/L.  The report limit is consistent with background levels in Northeastern Pennsylvania.  If the background level was above 4 mg/L, it would be advisable to test for radiological parameters, especially alpha/beta.  (OK)

Total Dissolved Solids  – 110 mg/L   – Total Dissolved Solids is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 500 mg/L. 

Total Suspended Solids - < 10 mg/L – no standard, but would recommend retesting to obtain a lower detection limit.

Uranium –0.0021 mg/L (Total) – Uranium is regulated as a primary drinking water standard by the EPA and PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.030 mg/L.  (OK)

Zinc  –0.0042 mg/L – Zinc is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 5.0 mg/L.  (OK)

Nitrate+Nitrite- N – 0.162 mg/L, this is well below the EPA / PADEP drinking water limit of 10mg N/L for nitrate-N and would also be below the limit of 1.0 mg N/L for nitrite-N. (OK)

Acetone - the reported value was 0.0057 mg/L (J/P -actually below the actual water limit of  < 0.002 mg/L- Treated Water- the untreated water had a reported value of  <0.002 mg/L) and no trigger limit is reported, but PADEP has a Medium Specific Concentration (MSC) for aquifers with a TDS of < 2500 mg/L of 33.0 mg/L and Massachusetts appears to have a drinking water standard of 6.3 mg/L. (OK)

Methyl ethyl ketone – 0.0014 mg/L (J/P- the sample is following the treatment system and below the detection limit for the method) – the untreated water had a value of < 0.002 mg/L ) – therefore the result is not actually detectable.
Methyl ethyl ketone is a colorless volatile liquid that is soluble in water. The odor threshold for methyl ethyl ketone is 5.4 parts per million (ppm), with an acetone-like odor reported. Methyl ethyl ketone is also referred to as 2-butanone.   The EPA and PADEP has not set a drinking water standard, but it appears that Massachusetts has set a level of 4 mg/L.  (OK- but additional monitoring advisable)

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/hlthef/methylet.html


Ethylene glycol –  the reported value is < 10 mg/L – there is not standard, but the EPA has a guidance limit of < 7 mg/L.  Other states have lower and higher standards:

New Jersey 0.300 mg/L (300 ppb)
Arizona 5.5 mg/L (5500 ppb)
New Hampshire 7.0 mg/L (7000 ppb)
Florida, Massachusetts, and Minnesota14.0 mg/L (14,000 ppb)
Minnesota

The EPA also collected a treated water sample.  After treatment, the following was documented:

Ethane – From 0.320 mg/L to < 0.0012 mg/L
Methane – From 22.00 mg/L to 0.026 mg/L
Chloride – From 7.24 mg/L to 7.01 mg/L
Sulfate – From 13.74 mg/L to 13.3 mg/L
Barium – From 0.164 mg/L to 0.164 mg/L
Copper – From < 0.002 mg/L to 0.0045 mg/L – suggest corrosion within plumbing of home, the result is still below the action limit.
Sodium – From 9.35 mg/L to 11.8 mg/L
Strontium – From 0.469 mg/L to 0.513 mg/L
Uranium – From  0.0019 mg/L to 0.0019 mg/L
Zinc – 0.0042 mg/L to 0.012 mg/L  - suggest corrosion within plumbing of the home, the result is still below the action limit.
Acetone - < 0.002 mg/L to 0.0057 mg/L (J) – the detect is below the reported detection limit for the method.
Methyl ethyl ketone - < 0.002 mg/L to 0.0014 mg/L – a suspected detect following treatment.

At a minimum, I would recommend retesting for ethylene glycol other and glycol-type compounds using a method that is more sensitive or conducting some type of standard additions analysis.

1. Methane was present at a level that is above the action limit of 7 mg/L and approaching a saturated level.  Action is needed.  Since the ratio of methane/ethane is 68 – this would suggest that the gas is of Thermogenic origin/

2. Methyl ethyl ketone and Acetone hits were suggested, but the reported values were actually below the method detection limit.  This suggests that additional monitoring may be advisable.

3. Detects for ketone and acetone after treatment suggest that this may be related to recent repairs or changes in the plumbing for the home.

4.Manganese is just below the secondary drinking water standard – continued monitoring is advisable.

Document can not be copied in whole or part without the expressed written permission of Mr. Brian Oram, B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc. http://www.bfenvironmental.com

Do you want to make a positive change in PA - that will cost you NO Money?
Help Support the Citizens Groundwater and Surfacewater Database and Submit Your Baseline Data !

 Free Information on Drinking Water Quality - http://www.water-research.net

Dimock Well Water HW-9 Acetone, Arsenic, Barium, Copper, Lead, Lithium, ethane, methane, glycols Pennsylvania


Comment
1. Without predrilling data, it is not possible to comment on the cause for any water quality problems.
2. Where possible, I have noted situations where elevated levels of a water quality parameter exists in Pennsylvania.
3. If duplicate analysis provided, I attempted to use the highest reported value.
5. This is not about cause and effect; it is about a review of the data.
6. A Well by Well - Review of the Data for Dimock, PA collected by EPA

Well – HW-9 (2/3/2012)
With the exception of the following parameters, the remaining values were reported as NOT Detected (U)
Anionic Surfactants – < 0.01 mg/L – the secondary drinking water standard for foaming agents is 0.5 mg/L.  (OK)

Arsenic – 0.001 mg/L – drinking water standard is <  0.010 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact and arsenic is a common problem in NEPA – about 6 % of private wells have arsenic above 0.010 mg/L. 

Barium – 0.106 mg/L – the primary drinking water standard for barium is 2.0 mg/L –– this does not suggest any specific impact and barium is typically detectable in non-saline impacted water at a level of less than 1 mg/L. (OK)

Boron –< 0.050 mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available. EPA appears to have a long-term health advisory of 2.0 mg/L, but other states have limits that range from 0.6 to 1 mg/L.   Therefore, this does not appear to suggest any form of impact.  (OK)

Calcium- 23.4 mg/L (Total)– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK) – the value seems low.

Chloride –13.8 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Chromium- < 0.002 mg/L (D) and the EPA/ PADEP primary drinking water standard is < 0.100 mg/L (OK).

Copper – 0.00375 mg/L (OK)- the secondary drinking water standard is 1.0 mg/L and the primary drinking water standard is 1.3 mg/L. (OK)

Ethane – < 0.0012 mg/L  – No specific drinking water standard (OK)

Fluoride – < 0.1 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is < 2 mg/L- PADEP drinking water standard is 2 mg/L.

Iron – < 0.100 mg/L (Total)) – Iron is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.3 mg/L.  Therefore, the total iron content does not exceed the secondary drinking water standard.  (OK)

Lead – 0.0016 mg/L (Total) - Lead is regulated as a primary standard (EPA and PA) at 0.015 mg/L, but the action level in PA for source water is 0.005 mg/L. Because of the hits for copper and lead, it is possible that the nuisance bacteria may be causing some corrosion related problems  (MIC) and it may be worth conducting a first flush analysis of the water. MIC – Microbiologically Induced Corrosion – Problem recommend inspection of the well, camera survey, shock disinfection, and retesting.  This is a common problem in NEPA.  (OK) = Level below all action limits, but monitoring recommended.

Lithium – < 0.200 mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but EPA has recommend a level be below 0.7 mg/L    (OK)

Methane –  0.0043 mg/L (J-actually below the detection limit for the method)  – No specific drinking water standard. (OK). The well water  is not above the new action limit of 7 mg/L. For more details, go to http://www.water-research.net/methanegas.htm

Magnesium-4.00 mg/L– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK)

Manganese– 0.0013 mg/L (Total) – Manganese is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.05 mg/L.  Therefore, the total manganese content does NOT exceed the secondary drinking water standard.   (OK)

Nickel – 0.0014 mg/L  – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard
is available, but the EPA has suggest a MCL of 0.1 mg/L.   (OK)

Sodium –8.48  mg/L  (D) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but the EPA has added it to the Candidate List to provide more analysis.  The EPA’s initial value of 20 mg/L has been clearly identified as not realistic.  When chloride (salt is sodium chloride) is present at a concentration of over 250 mg/L, the water can have an “off” taste. At 400+ mg/L chloride, the water will taste definitely salty. (Source- Dr. Brian Redmond, Professional Geologist). (OK)

Sulfate –18. 7 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Strontium – < 0.200 mg/L   – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but it is on the EPA Candidate List.  The EPA recommends that drinking water levels of nonradioactive strontium should not be more than 4 mg/L.  The report limit is consistent with background levels in Northeastern Pennsylvania.  If the background level was above 4 mg/L, it would be advisable to test for radiological parameters, especially alpha/beta.  (OK)

Total Dissolved Solids  – 110 mg/L   – Total Dissolved Solids is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 500 mg/L. 

Total Suspended Solids - < 10 mg/L – no standard, but would recommend retesting to obtain a lower detection limit.

Uranium –0.0021 mg/L (Total) – Uranium is regulated as a primary drinking water standard by the EPA and PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.030 mg/L.  (OK)

Zinc  –0.0206 mg/L – Zinc is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 5.0 mg/L.  (OK)

Nitrate+Nitrite- N – 2.41 mg/L, this is well below the EPA / PADEP drinking water limit of 10mg N/L for nitrate-N and would also be below the limit of 1.0 mg N/L for nitrite-N. (OK)

Acetone - the reported value was 0.0031 mg/L (J- actually below the actual water limit of  < 0.002 mg/L) and no trigger limit is reported, but PADEP has a Medium Specific Concentration (MSC) for aquifers with a TDS of < 2500 mg/L of 33.0 mg/L and Massachusetts appears to have a drinking water standard of 6.3 mg/L. (OK)

Ethylene glycol –  the reported value is < 10 mg/L – there is not standard, but the EPA has a guidance limit of < 7 mg/L.  Other states have lower and higher standards:

New Jersey 0.300 mg/L (300 ppb)
Arizona 5.5 mg/L (5500 ppb)
New Hampshire 7.0 mg/L (7000 ppb)
Florida, Massachusetts, and Minnesota14.0 mg/L (14,000 ppb)
Minnesota

At a minimum, I would recommend retesting for ethylene glycol other and glycol-type compounds using a method that is more sensitive or conducting some type of standard additions analysis.

1. No major problems
2. Recommend additional testing for nitrite.
3. Arsenic was detected.
4. Copper, lead, and zinc detected this could suggest a corrosion related problem. This is a common problem in NEPA

Document can not be copied in whole or part without the expressed written permission of Mr. Brian Oram, B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc. http://www.bfenvironmental.com

Do you want to make a positive change in PA - that will cost you NO Money?
Help Support the Citizens Groundwater and Surfacewater Database and Submit Your Baseline Data !

 Free Information on Drinking Water Quality - http://www.water-research.net

Monday, May 7, 2012

Well Water Dimock Pennsylvania HW-7 February 2012 EPA barium, manganese, lead, copper, nickel, zinc


Comment

1. Without predrilling data, it is not possible to comment on the cause for any water quality problems.
2. Where possible, I have noted situations where elevated levels of a water quality parameter exists in Pennsylvania.
3. If duplicate analysis provided, I attempted to use the highest reported value.
5. This is not about cause and effect; it is about a review of the data.
Well – HW-7 (2/15/2012)

With the exception of the following parameters, the remaining values were reported as NOT Detected (U)

Anionic Surfactants – < 0.01 mg/L – the secondary drinking water standard for foaming agents is 0.5 mg/L.  (OK)

Barium – 0.137 mg/L – the primary drinking water standard for barium is 2.0 mg/L –– this does not suggest any specific impact and barium is typically detectable in non-saline impacted water at a level of less than 1 mg/L. (OK)

Boron –< 0.050 mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available. EPA appears to have a long-term health advisory of 2.0 mg/L, but other states have limits that range from 0.6 to 1 mg/L.   Therefore, this does not appear to suggest any form of impact.  (OK)

Calcium- 36.5 mg/L (Total)– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK) – the value seems low.

Chloride –23.60 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Chromium- < 0.002 mg/L (D) and the EPA/ PADEP primary drinking water standard is < 0.100 mg/L (OK).

Copper – 0.0075 mg/L (OK)- the secondary drinking water standard is 1.0 mg/L and the primary drinking water standard is 1.3 mg/L. (OK)

Ethane – < 0.0012 mg/L  – No specific drinking water standard (OK)

Fluoride – < 0.1 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is < 2 mg/L- PADEP drinking water standard is 2 mg/L.

Iron – < 0.100 mg/L (Total)) – Iron is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.3 mg/L.  Therefore, the total iron content does not exceed the secondary drinking water standard.  (OK)

Lead – 0.0032 mg/L (Total) and < 0.001 mg/L (D)- Lead is regulated as a primary standard (EPA and PA) at 0.015 mg/L, but the action level in PA for source water is 0.005 mg/L. Because of the hits for copper and lead, it is possible that the nuisance bacteria may be causing some corrosion related problems – Call MIC – Microbiologically Induced Corrosion – Problem recommend inspection of the well, camera survey, shock disinfection, and retesting.  This is a common problem in NEPA.  (OK) = Level below all action limits, but monitoring recommended.

Lithium – < 0.200 mg/L (Total) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but EPA has recommend a level be below 0.7 mg/L    (OK)

Methane –  0.057 mg/L  – No specific drinking water standard. (OK).
The well water  is not above the new action limit of 7 mg/L. For more details, go to http://www.water-research.net/methanegas.htm

Magnesium-7.64 mg/L (D)– no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available.  (OK)

Manganese– 0.148 mg/L (Total) and 0.0456 mg/L (Dissolved) – Manganese is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.05 mg/L.  Therefore, the total manganese content does exceed the secondary drinking water standard.   (OK)- May be advisable to check for iron related bacteria.  Water may be associated have a black precipitate.

Nickel – 0.0031 mg/L (T ) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard
is available, but the EPA has suggest a MCL of 0.1 mg/L.   (OK)

Sodium –9.27 mg/L  (D) – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but the EPA has added it to the Candidate List to provide more analysis.  The EPA’s initial value of 20 mg/L has been clearly identified as not realistic.  When chloride (salt is sodium chloride) is present at a concentration of over 250 mg/L, the water can have an “off” taste. At 400+ mg/L chloride, the water will taste definitely salty. (Source- Dr. Brian Redmond, Professional Geologist). (OK)

Sulfate –10. 4 mg/L (OK) – drinking water standard is <  250 mg/L – this does not suggest any specific impact.

Strontium – < 0.200 mg/L   – no specific drinking water standard drinking water standard is available, but it is on the EPA Candidate List.  The EPA recommends that drinking water levels of nonradioactive strontium should not be more than 4 mg/L.  The report limit is consistent with background levels in Northeastern Pennsylvania.  If the background level was above 4 mg/L, it would be advisable to test for radiological parameters, especially alpha/beta.  (OK)

Total Dissolved Solids  – 141 mg/L   – Total Dissolved Solids is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 500 mg/L. 

Total Suspended Solids - < 10 mg/L – no standard, but would recommend retesting to obtain a lower detection limit.

Uranium –0.0021 mg/L (Total) – Uranium is regulated as a primary drinking water standard by the EPA and PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 0.030 mg/L.  (OK)

Zinc  –0.0192 mg/L (Total) – Zinc is regulated as a secondary drinking water standard by the PADEP in Pennsylvania and the action limit is 5.0 mg/L.  (OK)

Nitrate+Nitrite- N – 0.874 mg/L, this is well below the EPA / PADEP drinking water limit of 10mg N/L for nitrate-N and would also be below the limit of 1.0 mg N/L for nitrite-N. (OK)

Ethylene glycol –  the reported value is < 10 mg/L – there is no standard, but the EPA has a guidance limit of < 7 mg/L.  Other states have lower and higher standards:

New Jersey 0.300 mg/L (300 ppb)
Arizona 5.5 mg/L (5500 ppb)
New Hampshire 7.0 mg/L (7000 ppb)
Florida, Massachusetts, and Minnesota14.0 mg/L (14,000 ppb)
Minnesota

At a minimum, I would recommend retesting for ethylene glycol other other glycol compounds using a method that is more sensitive or conducting some type of standard additions analysis.

No major problems

1. No major problems
2. Manganese is above the secondary drinking water limit.
3. Copper, lead, and zinc detected this could suggest a corrosion related problem. This is a common problem in NEPA

Document can not be copied in whole or part without the expressed written permission of Mr. Brian Oram, B.F. Environmental Consultants Inc. http://www.bfenvironmental.com

Do you want to make a positive change in PA - that will cost you NO Money?
Help Support the Citizens Groundwater and Surfacewater Database and Submit Your Baseline Data !

 Free Information on Drinking Water Quality - http://www.water-research.net